Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram Schulte
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram Schulte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram Schulte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram Schulte more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram Schulte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram Schulte. The network helps show where Wolfram Schulte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfram Schulte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfram Schulte.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfram Schulte based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfram Schulte. Wolfram Schulte is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomson, Paul, Shuo Chen, Alastair F. Donaldson, et al.. (2016). Uncovering bugs in distributed storage systems during testing (not in production. Spiral (Imperial College London). 249–262.6 indexed citations
Meyerovich, Leo A., Todd Mytkowicz, & Wolfram Schulte. (2011). Data Parallel Programming for Irregular Tree Computations.3 indexed citations
6.
Burg, Brian R., et al.. (2011). C3: an experimental, extensible, reconfigurable platform for HTML-based applications. 6–6.6 indexed citations
7.
Butler, Michael & Wolfram Schulte. (2011). FM 2011: Formal Methods - 17th International Symposium on Formal Methods, Limerick, Ireland, June 20-24, 2011. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
8.
Veanes, Margus, Nikolaj Bjørner, Yuri Gurevich, & Wolfram Schulte. (2009). Symbolic Bounded Model Checking of Abstract State Machines.. 3. 149–170.11 indexed citations
9.
Jacobs, Bart, Jan Smans, Frank Piessens, & Wolfram Schulte. (2006). A Statically Verifiable Programming Model for Concurrent ObjectOriented Programs. Lirias (KU Leuven).5 indexed citations
Jacobs, Bart, Erik Meijer, Frank Piessens, & Wolfram Schulte. (2005). Iterators revisited: proof rules and implementation. 1–21.10 indexed citations
12.
Gurevich, Yuri, Benjamin Rossman, & Wolfram Schulte. (2005). Semantic essence of AsmL. Theoretical Computer Science. 343(3). 370–412.55 indexed citations
13.
Campbell, Colin, Wolfgang Grieskamp, Lev Nachmanson, et al.. (2005). Testing concurrent object-oriented systems with Spec Explorer.5 indexed citations
14.
Rustan, K., Mirka Leino, & Wolfram Schulte. (2004). Exception safety for C. 218–227.11 indexed citations
15.
Schulte, Wolfram, et al.. (2004). Formal Methods and Software Engineering: 6th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods, ICFEM 2004, Seattle, WA, USA, November 8-12, 2004, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
16.
Barnett, Mike, et al.. (2003). Serious Specification for Composing Components.7 indexed citations
17.
Bierman, Gavin, Erik Meijer, & Wolfram Schulte. (2002). The essence of data access in Cω -- The power is in the dot!.
18.
Barnett, Michael P. & Wolfram Schulte. (2001). The ABCs of specification: asml, behavior, and components.. Informatica (slovenia). 25(4). 517–526.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.