Wolfram Ratzinger

422 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Wolfram Ratzinger is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolfram Ratzinger has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 8 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Wolfram Ratzinger's work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers). Wolfram Ratzinger is often cited by papers focused on Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (8 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers). Wolfram Ratzinger collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Israel and Italy. Wolfram Ratzinger's co-authors include Pedro Schwaller, Camila S. Machado, Ben A. Stefanek, Eric Madge, S. Schenk, Enrico Morgante, Gilad Pérez, Hyungjin Kim, Abhishek Banerjee and Gilad Perez and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical review. D and Physical Review X.

In The Last Decade

Wolfram Ratzinger

10 papers receiving 281 citations

Hit Papers

Primordial gravitational waves in the nano-Hertz regime a... 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 25 50 75

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wolfram Ratzinger Germany 8 258 190 43 29 11 10 285
Eric Madge Israel 6 150 0.6× 120 0.6× 30 0.7× 31 1.1× 19 1.7× 9 205
Anirudh Prabhu United States 9 231 0.9× 235 1.2× 16 0.4× 40 1.4× 7 0.6× 12 283
Ke-Pan Xie China 13 378 1.5× 484 2.5× 20 0.5× 23 0.8× 9 0.8× 32 571
Z. T. Sun United States 9 230 0.9× 314 1.7× 15 0.3× 71 2.4× 5 0.5× 10 362
Jan Schütte-Engel United States 6 258 1.0× 152 0.8× 37 0.9× 69 2.4× 6 0.5× 10 302
Juan Urrutia Estonia 9 322 1.2× 140 0.7× 47 1.1× 14 0.5× 4 0.4× 15 337
Chang Sub Shin South Korea 15 491 1.9× 517 2.7× 16 0.4× 38 1.3× 6 0.5× 41 617
Huai-Ke Guo United States 16 455 1.8× 477 2.5× 20 0.5× 34 1.2× 7 0.6× 25 570
Wenzer Qin United States 9 234 0.9× 160 0.8× 34 0.8× 10 0.3× 4 0.4× 11 260
Leo Tsukada United States 6 190 0.7× 100 0.5× 30 0.7× 19 0.7× 6 0.5× 11 205

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram Ratzinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram Ratzinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram Ratzinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram Ratzinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfram Ratzinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram Ratzinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram Ratzinger. The network helps show where Wolfram Ratzinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfram Ratzinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfram Ratzinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfram Ratzinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfram Ratzinger. Wolfram Ratzinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Dine, Michael, et al.. (2025). Nelson-Barr ultralight dark matter. Physical review. D. 111(1). 5 indexed citations
2.
Fuchs, Elina, Eric Madge, E. Peik, et al.. (2025). Searching for Dark Matter with the Th229 Nuclear Lineshape from Laser Spectroscopy. Physical Review X. 15(2). 4 indexed citations
3.
Ratzinger, Wolfram, S. Schenk, & Pedro Schwaller. (2024). A coordinate-independent formalism for detecting high-frequency gravitational waves. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(8). 10 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Hyungjin, et al.. (2024). Probing an ultralight QCD axion with electromagnetic quadratic interaction. Physical review. D. 109(1). 14 indexed citations
5.
Madge, Eric, et al.. (2023). Primordial gravitational waves in the nano-Hertz regime and PTA data — towards solving the GW inverse problem. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(10). 84 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Ratzinger, Wolfram, et al.. (2023). One μ to rule them all: CMB spectral distortions can probe domain walls, cosmic strings and low scale phase transitions. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2023(2). 39–39. 21 indexed citations
7.
Madge, Eric, et al.. (2022). Audible axions with a booster: Stochastic gravitational waves from rotating ALPs. SciPost Physics. 12(5). 22 indexed citations
8.
Banerjee, Abhishek, Eric Madge, Gilad Pérez, Wolfram Ratzinger, & Pedro Schwaller. (2021). Gravitational wave echo of relaxion trapping. Physical review. D. 104(5). 14 indexed citations
9.
Machado, Camila S., Wolfram Ratzinger, Pedro Schwaller, & Ben A. Stefanek. (2020). Gravitational wave probes of axionlike particles. Physical review. D. 102(7). 50 indexed citations
10.
Machado, Camila S., Wolfram Ratzinger, Pedro Schwaller, & Ben A. Stefanek. (2019). Audible axions. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2019(1). 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026