Wolfram C. Poller

28 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

Wolfram C. Poller
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 51
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 148
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 98
Replace Johanna Schneider with:
Johanna Schneider Germany
Sarah Schock Canada
Darren Fernandes Australia
Markus Vallaster United States
Paula C. Reggiani Argentina
Hongli Li China
Yuhao Xu China
Ross J. Lennen United Kingdom
Wolfram C. Poller relative to Johanna Schneider Germany Johanna Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Johanna Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram C. Poller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram C. Poller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram C. Poller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram C. Poller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfram C. Poller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram C. Poller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram C. Poller. The network helps show where Wolfram C. Poller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wolfram C. Poller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolfram C. Poller Line = papers co-authored together Wolfram C. Poller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020117
2 202378
3 201356
4 201647
5 201639
6 201336
7 201133
8 201833
9 201724
10 201721
11 201519
12 201619
13 202015
14 201415
15 201511
16 201211
17 201111
18 20187
19 20156
20 20256

About Wolfram C. Poller

Wolfram C. Poller is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 28 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (31 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (51 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (148 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations). Wolfram C. Poller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Filip K. Świrski, Matthias Nahrendorf, René Bernard, Rüdiger W. Veh, Scott J. Russo, Henryk Dreger, Vince I. Madai, Verena Stangl, Antje Ludwig and Matthias Taupitz. Their work appears in journals such as Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Atherosclerosis Supplements, Investigative Radiology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact