Wolf‐Dieter Schubert
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Dirk W. HeinzNorbert KraußWolfram SaengerOlaf KlukasHorst Tobias WittDieter JahnPetra FrommeJürgen Wehland
- Topics
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (15 papers)Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (12 papers)RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wolf‐Dieter Schubert
70 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Molecular Biology 2.2k
- Biotechnology 487
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 459
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 370
- Materials Chemistry 333
Countries citing papers authored by Wolf‐Dieter Schubert
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf‐Dieter Schubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf‐Dieter Schubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf‐Dieter Schubert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf‐Dieter Schubert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf‐Dieter Schubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf‐Dieter Schubert. The network helps show where Wolf‐Dieter Schubert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolf‐Dieter Schubert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolf‐Dieter Schubert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolf‐Dieter Schubert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolf‐Dieter Schubert. Wolf‐Dieter Schubert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 169 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 167 | |
| 13 | 80 | |
| 14 | 133 | |
| 15 | 235 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 195 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Wolf‐Dieter Schubert
Wolf‐Dieter Schubert is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Endocrinology and Molecular Biology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (15 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (12 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (487 citations), Molecular Biology (2.2k citations) and Endocrinology (129 citations). Wolf‐Dieter Schubert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dirk W. Heinz, Norbert Krauß, Wolfram Saenger, Olaf Klukas, Horst Tobias Witt, Dieter Jahn, Petra Fromme, Jürgen Wehland, Jörg O. Schulze and Petra Fromme. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.