William S. Tuten
- Molecular Biology
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Austin RoordaWolf M. HarmeningRamkumar SabesanBrian P. SchmidtLawrence C. SincichPavan TiruveedhulaAndy J. FischerMelissa A. Scott
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (20 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
William S. Tuten
25 papers receiving 610 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Molecular Biology 324
- Ophthalmology 315
- Cognitive Neuroscience 176
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 159
- Epidemiology 133
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Tuten
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Tuten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Tuten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Tuten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Tuten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Tuten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Tuten. The network helps show where William S. Tuten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Tuten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Tuten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Tuten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Tuten. William S. Tuten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | Cellular-scale assessment of visual function in Choroideremia | 1 |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Psychophysical evidence for inhibitory lateral interactions between individual cones in the parafovea | 1 |
| 16 | Functional organization of color in the trichromatic cone mosaic | 1 |
| 17 | Studying the neural circuitry of blue with single cone stimulation | 1 |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 76 | |
| 20 | 85 |
About William S. Tuten
William S. Tuten is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (20 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (315 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (176 citations) and Biophysics (41 citations). William S. Tuten has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Austin Roorda, Wolf M. Harmening, Ramkumar Sabesan, Brian P. Schmidt, Lawrence C. Sincich, Pavan Tiruveedhula, Andy J. Fischer, Melissa A. Scott, Jessica I. W. Morgan and David H. Brainard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.