Countries citing papers authored by Wm. Dennis Huber
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wm. Dennis Huber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wm. Dennis Huber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wm. Dennis Huber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wm. Dennis Huber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wm. Dennis Huber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wm. Dennis Huber. The network helps show where Wm. Dennis Huber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wm. Dennis Huber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wm. Dennis Huber.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wm. Dennis Huber based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wm. Dennis Huber. Wm. Dennis Huber is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2019). The FASB’s Sabotage of Congressional Policy and Federal Securities Laws. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
2.
Huber, Wm. Dennis & James A. DiGabriele. (2017). Accounting Research Productivity Benchmarks : Who Uses Them?. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
3.
Huber, Wm. Dennis & D. Larry Crumbley. (2017). Public Accounting and Financing Terrorist Organizations and Activities: Ethical and Legal Obligations. SSRN Electronic Journal.
4.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2016). Accounting Research Productivity: More Heat Than Light?. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2016). Forensic Accounting, Fraud Theory, and the End of the Fraud Triangle. SSRN Electronic Journal.45 indexed citations
6.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2016). The SEC's Ultra Vires Recognition of the FASB as a Standard Setting Body. SSRN Electronic Journal. 19(2). 123–152.2 indexed citations
7.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2015). The Myth of Protecting the Public Interest: The Case of the Missing Mandate in Federal Securities Laws. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
8.
Huber, Wm. Dennis & James A. DiGabriele. (2015). What Is the Purpose of Research in Forensic Accounting. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2015). Public Accounting and the Myth of the Public Interest. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2015). The Structure of the Public Accounting Industry – Why Existing Market Models Fail. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2012). Is Forensic Accounting in the United States Becoming a Profession. SSRN Electronic Journal.38 indexed citations
18.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2012). Does the American Accounting Association Exist? An Example of Public Document Research. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
19.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2011). A Comparison of Forensic Accounting Corporations in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
20.
Huber, Wm. Dennis. (2001). The influence of culture on auditors' evaluation of internal control and assessment of control risk. UMI Dissertation Services eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.