W.K. Tay
About
In The Last Decade
W.K. Tay
2 papers receiving 27 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Psychiatry and Mental health 29
- Philosophy 11
- Pharmacology 7
- Clinical Psychology 7
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 6
Countries citing papers authored by W.K. Tay
This map shows the geographic impact of W.K. Tay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.K. Tay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.K. Tay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W.K. Tay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.K. Tay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.K. Tay. The network helps show where W.K. Tay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.K. Tay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.K. Tay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.K. Tay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.K. Tay. W.K. Tay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Health clinical practice guidelines: schizophrenia. | 21 |
| 2 | A comparative study of pipothiazine palmitate and fluphenazine decanoate in the maintenance of remission of schizophrenia. | 8 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.