W.J. Frederick

7.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
47 papers, 5.7k citations indexed

About

W.J. Frederick is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, W.J. Frederick has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 5.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 8 papers in Materials Chemistry and 7 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in W.J. Frederick's work include Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (9 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (8 papers) and Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (5 papers). W.J. Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (9 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (8 papers) and Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (5 papers). W.J. Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Finland and Slovakia. W.J. Frederick's co-authors include Arthur J. Ragauskas, Brian H. Davison, George J. P. Britovsek, Timothy J. Tschaplinski, Charlotte K. Williams, Jason P. Hallett, Richard H. Templer, Charles A. Eckert, Charles L. Liotta and Richard Murphy and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Analytical Chemistry and Bioresource Technology.

In The Last Decade

W.J. Frederick

46 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Hit Papers

The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 1000 2.0k 3.0k 4.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W.J. Frederick United States 17 4.1k 1.1k 1.0k 751 672 47 5.7k
Seung‐Hyeon Moon South Korea 58 6.1k 1.5× 859 0.7× 593 0.6× 1.0k 1.4× 824 1.2× 224 11.4k
Ralph P. Overend Canada 32 3.6k 0.9× 859 0.7× 741 0.7× 464 0.6× 246 0.4× 114 4.7k
Dietrich Meier Germany 45 7.0k 1.7× 354 0.3× 406 0.4× 1.6k 2.1× 492 0.7× 101 8.1k
Sunkyu Park United States 45 5.5k 1.3× 990 0.9× 3.6k 3.5× 706 0.9× 757 1.1× 163 9.3k
Pascale Champagne Canada 44 2.7k 0.7× 504 0.4× 911 0.9× 547 0.7× 545 0.8× 176 6.8k
Shiro Saka Japan 60 11.4k 2.8× 2.3k 2.0× 1.3k 1.3× 2.9k 3.8× 572 0.9× 226 12.9k
Amarjeet Bassi Canada 38 1.5k 0.4× 857 0.7× 796 0.8× 838 1.1× 460 0.7× 120 5.6k
Yunjun Yan China 42 1.9k 0.5× 3.8k 3.3× 342 0.3× 468 0.6× 615 0.9× 289 6.3k
Carl J. Houtman United States 28 1.4k 0.3× 289 0.3× 497 0.5× 261 0.3× 636 0.9× 87 2.9k
Fikret Kargı Türkiye 52 3.1k 0.8× 1.5k 1.3× 133 0.1× 391 0.5× 555 0.8× 201 8.9k

Countries citing papers authored by W.J. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.J. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.J. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.J. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.J. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.J. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.J. Frederick. The network helps show where W.J. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.J. Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.J. Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.J. Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.J. Frederick. W.J. Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jarvis, Mark W., Thomas J. Haas, Bryon S. Donohoe, et al.. (2010). Elucidation of Biomass Pyrolysis Products Using a Laminar Entrained Flow Reactor and Char Particle Imaging. Energy & Fuels. 25(1). 324–336. 58 indexed citations
2.
Larson, Eric D., Stefano Consonni, Ryan Katofsky, Kristiina Iisa, & W.J. Frederick. (2008). An Assessment of Gasification-Based Biorefining at Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills in the United States, Part A: Background and Assumptions. TAPPI Journal. 7(11). 8–14. 6 indexed citations
3.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (2008). Production of ethanol from carbohydrates from loblolly pine: A technical and economic assessment. Bioresource Technology. 99(11). 5051–5057. 72 indexed citations
4.
Ragauskas, Arthur J., Charlotte K. Williams, Brian H. Davison, et al.. (2006). The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials. Science. 311(5760). 484–489. 4635 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Wannenmacher, Nick, Shoichi Kimura, & W.J. Frederick. (2005). Solubility of Aluminosilicates in Kraft Green and White Liquors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 44(24). 9316–9322. 7 indexed citations
6.
Duhamel, Melanie, et al.. (2004). The sintering tendency of recovery boiler precipitator dust. TAPPI Journal. 3(10). 25–30. 6 indexed citations
7.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (2004). Crystallization and control of sodium salt scales in black liquor concentrators. TAPPI Journal. 3(6). 7–13. 13 indexed citations
8.
Shi, Bing, W.J. Frederick, & Ronald W. Rousseau. (2003). Effects of Calcium and Other Ionic Impurities on the Primary Nucleation of Burkeite. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 42(12). 2861–2869. 18 indexed citations
9.
Sricharoenchaikul, Viboon, et al.. (2001). Carbon and char residue yields from rapid pyrolysis of kraft black liquor. Bioresource Technology. 77(2). 131–138. 33 indexed citations
10.
Stoughton, Roland, Roger E. Bumgarner, W.J. Frederick, & Richard McIndoe. (1997). Data‐adaptive algorithms for calling alleles in repeat polymorphisms. Electrophoresis. 18(1). 1–5. 7 indexed citations
11.
Iisa, Kristiina, et al.. (1997). Kinetics of the Sulfation of NaCl at Combustion Conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 36(10). 4212–4216. 62 indexed citations
12.
Dayton, David C. & W.J. Frederick. (1996). Direct Observation of Alkali Vapor Release during Biomass Combustion and Gasification. 2. Black Liquor Combustion at 1100 °C. Energy & Fuels. 10(2). 284–292. 37 indexed citations
13.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (1992). Phase Behavior of Sodium Lignosulfonates in Water-Ethanol Mixtures. Holzforschung. 46(4). 325–330. 4 indexed citations
14.
Frederick, W.J. & Mikko Hupa. (1991). Gasification of black liquor char with CO 2 at elevated pressures.. TAPPI Journal. 74(7). 177–183. 5 indexed citations
15.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (1991). Swelling of spent pulping liquor droplets during combustion. 17(5). 11 indexed citations
16.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (1988). Evaluation of Pitzer ion interaction parameters of aqueous electrolytes at 25.degree.C. 1. Single salt parameters. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 33(2). 177–184. 246 indexed citations
17.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (1988). SOLUTE REJECTION IN THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF POLYDISPERSE ORGANICS FROM NATURAL PRODUCTS. Chemical Engineering Communications. 68(1). 197–211. 1 indexed citations
18.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (1982). The determination and temperature-dependence of the stability constant of the calcium—catechol-4-sulfonate complex in alkaline aqueous media. Analytica Chimica Acta. 138. 237–243. 8 indexed citations
19.
Frederick, W.J., et al.. (1980). New process alternatives in the forest products industries. 1 indexed citations
20.
Wilkes, K.E., et al.. (1975). Evaluation of the theoretical potential for energy conservation in seven basic industries. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 76. 15644. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026