Winifred Nolan
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul J. FosterTin AungDavid S. FriedmanScott D. SmithCe ZhengJovina SeePaul ChewSunita Radhakrishnan
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (42 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (22 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Winifred Nolan
44 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Ophthalmology 1.7k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.4k
- Biomedical Engineering 231
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 205
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 156
Countries citing papers authored by Winifred Nolan
This map shows the geographic impact of Winifred Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winifred Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winifred Nolan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Winifred Nolan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winifred Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winifred Nolan. The network helps show where Winifred Nolan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Winifred Nolan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Winifred Nolan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Winifred Nolan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Winifred Nolan. Winifred Nolan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | Is bleb needling after failed trabeculectomy a procedure worth considering? 5 year outcome with a standardized technique. | 1 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 234 | |
| 19 | Detection of Patients at Risk of Angle–closure Using Anterior Segment OCT | 5 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Winifred Nolan
Winifred Nolan is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (42 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (22 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.7k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.4k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (156 citations). Winifred Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Foster, Tin Aung, David S. Friedman, Scott D. Smith, Ce Zheng, Jovina See, Paul Chew, Sunita Radhakrishnan, Paul Chew and Clare Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.