Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Wim Van Lerberghe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Van Lerberghe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Van Lerberghe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Van Lerberghe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wim Van Lerberghe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Van Lerberghe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Van Lerberghe. The network helps show where Wim Van Lerberghe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim Van Lerberghe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim Van Lerberghe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim Van Lerberghe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wim Van Lerberghe. Wim Van Lerberghe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lerberghe, Wim Van & Denis Porignon. (2003). Of coping, poaching and the harm they can do. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Lerberghe, Wim Van, Cláudia Conceição, Wim Van Damme, & Paulo Ferrinho. (2002). When staff is underpaid. Dealing with the individual coping strategies of health personnel. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).1 indexed citations
8.
Sahel, Amina, et al.. (2002). Des catastrophes obstétricales évitées de justesse: les near miss dans les hôpitaux marocains. LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine). 11(4). 229–235.10 indexed citations
Lerberghe, Wim Van & Vincent De Brouwere. (2000). Etat de santé et santé de l'état en Afrique subsaharienne. Afrique contemporaine. 175–190.12 indexed citations
12.
Brouwere, Vincent De, René Tonglet, & Wim Van Lerberghe. (1997). La "Maternité sans Risque" dans les pays en développement: les leçons de l'histoire.4 indexed citations
13.
Damme, Wim Van, et al.. (1997). Measles vaccination and inflammatory bowel disease [letter]. 350. 1774–1775.5 indexed citations
14.
Brouwere, Vincent De, et al.. (1996). [Estimation of need for obstetrical interventions in Morocco. An approach based on the spatial analysis of deficits].. PubMed. 44(2). 111–24.17 indexed citations
15.
Lerberghe, Wim Van, et al.. (1992). [Typology and performance of first-referral hospitals in sub-saharan Africa].. PubMed. 72 Suppl 2. 1–51.7 indexed citations
Lerberghe, Wim Van, et al.. (1990). Self-financing and self-management of basic health services.. PubMed. 11(4). 451–4.5 indexed citations
18.
Lerberghe, Wim Van & Yves Lafort. (1990). The role of the hospital in the district: delivering or supporting primary health care?.23 indexed citations
19.
Lerberghe, Wim Van, et al.. (1990). Autofinancement et autogestion des services de santé de base. 11(4). 489–492.1 indexed citations
20.
Lerberghe, Wim Van, et al.. (1984). Antenatal screening for fetopelvic dystocias. A cost-effectiveness approach to the choice of simple indicators for use by auxiliary personnel. The Kasongo Project Team.. PubMed. 87(4). 173–83.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.