Wim Moesen
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Finance top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Kristof De WitteBenny GeysPaul De GrauweLaurens CherchyeTom Van PuyenbroeckHarry P. BowenPhilippe Van CauwenbergeNicky Rogge
- Topics
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (9 papers)Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (7 papers)Local Government Finance and Decentralization (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wim Moesen
19 papers receiving 439 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Economics and Econometrics 351
- Management Science and Operations Research 148
- Political Science and International Relations 128
- Finance 70
- Strategy and Management 46
Countries citing papers authored by Wim Moesen
This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Moesen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Moesen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Moesen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wim Moesen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Moesen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Moesen. The network helps show where Wim Moesen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim Moesen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim Moesen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim Moesen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wim Moesen. Wim Moesen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 65 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 99 | |
| 7 | Gains for All: A proposal for a common Eurobond. CEPS Commentaries, 3 April 2009 | 8 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 'Benefit of the doubt' composite indicators | 4 |
| 12 | A COMPOSITE INDEX OF THE CREATIVE ECONOMY With Application to Regional Best Practices | 7 |
| 13 | 71 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | A non-parametric Free Disposal Hull (FDH) approach to technical efficiency: an illustration of radial and graph efficiency measures and some sensitivity results | 23 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Efficiency and equity in block grant design: Simulating some alternatives for Flemish municipalities | 2 |
About Wim Moesen
Wim Moesen is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 19 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (9 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (7 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (351 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (148 citations) and Finance (70 citations). Wim Moesen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristof De Witte, Benny Geys, Paul De Grauwe, Laurens Cherchye, Tom Van Puyenbroeck, Harry P. Bowen, Philippe Van Cauwenberge, Nicky Rogge, Andrea Saltelli and Michaela Saisana. Their work appears in journals such as Public Choice, Corporate Governance and JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.