Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
2012527 citationsWim Kellens, Teun Terpstra et al.Risk Analysisprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Kellens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Kellens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Kellens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Kellens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Kellens. The network helps show where Wim Kellens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim Kellens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim Kellens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim Kellens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wim Kellens. Wim Kellens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Verfaillie, Els, et al.. (2012). A questionnaire to evaluate the GI job market in Flanders: first findings. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
4.
Kellens, Wim, Teun Terpstra, & Philippe De Maeyer. (2012). Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Risk Analysis. 33(1). 24–49.527 indexed citations breakdown →
Kellens, Wim. (2011). Analysis, perception and communication of coastal flood risks: Examining objective and subjective risk assessment = Analyse, perceptie en communicatie van overstromingsrisico’s in kustgebieden: onderzoek naar objectieve en subjectieve risicobeoordeling. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).1 indexed citations
9.
Vanneuville, Wouter, Wim Kellens, Philippe De Maeyer, Genserik Reniers, & Frank Witlox. (2011). Is 'flood risk management' identical to 'flood disaster management'?. VLIZ (Flemish Institute for the Sea). 4(1).6 indexed citations
10.
Kellens, Wim & Philippe De Maeyer. (2009). Understanding the public perception of coastal flood risks. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Kellens, Wim, Wouter Vanneuville, Kristien Ooms, & Philippe De Maeyer. (2009). Communicating flood risk to the public by cartography. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).6 indexed citations
13.
Verwaest, T., et al.. (2008). Overstromingsrisico's aan de Vlaamse kust. Evaluatie van de zeewering: deel 1. Methodologie.2 indexed citations
14.
Verwaest, T., Johan Reyns, Katrien Van der Biest, et al.. (2008). SAFECoast: Comparison between different flood risk methodologies. Action 3B report - SAFECOAST Interreg IIIb North Sea Project. VLIZ (Flemish Institute for the Sea).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.