William W. Daniel

972 citations
30 papers · 711 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William W. Daniel

29 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

William W. Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 231
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 75
  • Surgery 386
  • Emergency Medicine 80
  • Nephrology 57
Replace B G Coleman with:
B G Coleman United States
Nefise Çağla Tarhan Türkiye
Nasroolla Damry Belgium
Wenzel Vas United States
M Garrido Spain
Frederick A. Gage United States
Young Tae Ko South Korea
Noah Susman United States
R. Brent Harrison United States
L Gecelter South Africa
William W. Daniel relative to B G Coleman United States B G Coleman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
B G Coleman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Daniel. The network helps show where William W. Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William W. Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William W. Daniel Line = papers co-authored together William W. Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19966
2 1993176
3 199242
4
The value of the Nørgaard view in the evaluation of erosive arthritis.
19907
5 19892
6 19892
7 19898
8 198743
9 19859
10 19831
11 198150
12 197765
13 19729
14 19632
15 196123
16 196127
17 19611
18 195933
19 19592
20 19563

About William W. Daniel

William W. Daniel is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nephrology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery and Emergency Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 711 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (3 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (2 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (231 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (75 citations), Surgery (386 citations), Emergency Medicine (80 citations) and Nephrology (57 citations). William W. Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William F. Conway, C W Hayes, Alexander Brunschwig, David M. Witten, Panayotis P. Kelalis, George M. Farrow, Glen W. Hartman, George A. Hallenbeck, Leopold G. Koss and Graciela S. Alarcón. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026