William Verheul
Impact in
- Family Practice top 5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Empathy and Medical Education
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 7
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 5
-
- Empathy and Medical Education 5
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Jozien M. Bensing (10 shared papers)Sandra van Dulmen (3 shared papers)Peter Spreeuwenberg (1 shared paper)Liesbeth M. van Vliet (1 shared paper)Elsken van der Wall (1 shared paper)Akke Albada (1 shared paper)A. van den Brink-Muinen (2 shared papers)François Schellevis (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Patient Education and Counseling (3 papers)Family Practice (1 paper)International Journal of Psychophysiology (1 paper)Health Education (1 paper)Medical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsNorwayAustralia
In The Last Decade
William Verheul
11 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Family Practice 48
- Psychiatry and Mental health 189
- General Health Professions 272
- Cognitive Neuroscience 93
- Pharmacy 19
Countries citing papers authored by William Verheul
This map shows the geographic impact of William Verheul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Verheul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Verheul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Verheul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Verheul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Verheul. The network helps show where William Verheul may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside William Verheul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 12 | Wat als burgemeesters het echt voor het zeggen hebben | 2015 | 0 |
About William Verheul
William Verheul is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (48 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (189 citations), General Health Professions (272 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (93 citations) and Pharmacy (19 citations). William Verheul has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jozien M. Bensing, Sandra van Dulmen, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Liesbeth M. van Vliet, Elsken van der Wall, Akke Albada, A. van den Brink-Muinen, François Schellevis, Fred Tromp and Arnstein Finset. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Family Practice, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Health Education and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.