William Tooke

1.0k total citations
10 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

William Tooke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, William Tooke has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in William Tooke's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). William Tooke is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). William Tooke collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. William Tooke's co-authors include William Ickes, Eric Robertson, Gary Teng, Joshua D. Duntley, David M. Buss, David P. Schmitt, Todd K. Shackelford, Victor Bissonnette, Steven Schachter and Gary G. Brannigan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of School Psychology and Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

William Tooke

10 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Tooke United States 9 246 223 182 139 61 10 449
Robert Driver United States 7 144 0.6× 177 0.8× 240 1.3× 114 0.8× 75 1.2× 8 469
Susan Sprecher United States 3 236 1.0× 254 1.1× 261 1.4× 164 1.2× 27 0.4× 3 550
Judith A. Easton United States 9 307 1.2× 247 1.1× 124 0.7× 146 1.1× 77 1.3× 12 496
Bruce D. Layton United States 8 143 0.6× 146 0.7× 151 0.8× 75 0.5× 22 0.4× 12 422
Cari D. Goetz United States 8 376 1.5× 296 1.3× 157 0.9× 163 1.2× 68 1.1× 15 538
Noah S. Glassman United States 8 126 0.5× 263 1.2× 316 1.7× 151 1.1× 109 1.8× 12 569
Kelly Asao United States 8 236 1.0× 180 0.8× 164 0.9× 116 0.8× 128 2.1× 9 446
Konrad Schnabel Germany 10 134 0.5× 251 1.1× 219 1.2× 220 1.6× 68 1.1× 21 543
Marilyn Mendolia United States 12 156 0.6× 141 0.6× 251 1.4× 166 1.2× 82 1.3× 20 494
Wiebke Neberich Germany 12 133 0.5× 291 1.3× 346 1.9× 168 1.2× 46 0.8× 13 576

Countries citing papers authored by William Tooke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Tooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Tooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Tooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Tooke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Tooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Tooke. The network helps show where William Tooke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Tooke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Tooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Tooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Tooke. William Tooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Schmitt, David P., Todd K. Shackelford, Joshua D. Duntley, et al.. (2002). Is There an Early-30s Peak in Female Sexual Desire? Cross-Sectional Evidence from the United States and Canada. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 11(1). 1–18. 20 indexed citations
2.
Schmitt, David P., Todd K. Shackelford, Joshua D. Duntley, William Tooke, & David M. Buss. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships. 8(4). 425–455. 77 indexed citations
3.
McCormick, Naomi B., et al.. (1991). Ret in the college classroom. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 9(2). 95–111. 4 indexed citations
4.
Schachter, Steven, Gary G. Brannigan, & William Tooke. (1991). Comparison of two scoring systems for the modified version of the Bender-Gestalt test. Journal of School Psychology. 29(3). 265–269. 16 indexed citations
5.
Tooke, William, et al.. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology. 12(5). 345–364. 148 indexed citations
6.
Ickes, William & William Tooke. (1988). The observational method: Studying the interaction of minds and bodies.. 27 indexed citations
7.
Ickes, William, et al.. (1988). Naturalistic social cognition: Intersubjectivity in same-sex dyads. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 12(1). 58–82. 23 indexed citations
8.
Tooke, William & William Ickes. (1988). A Measure of Adherence to Conventional Morality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 6(3-4). 310–334. 20 indexed citations
9.
Ickes, William, Eric Robertson, William Tooke, & Gary Teng. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(1). 66–82. 8 indexed citations
10.
Ickes, William, Eric Robertson, William Tooke, & Gary Teng. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(1). 66–82. 106 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026