William T. Wojtach

408 total citations
9 papers, 207 citations indexed

About

William T. Wojtach is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, William T. Wojtach has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 207 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in William T. Wojtach's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). William T. Wojtach is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). William T. Wojtach collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Bulgaria. William T. Wojtach's co-authors include Dale Purves, R. Beau Lotto, Yaniv Morgenstern, Janani Sundararajan, Brian B. Monson and Catherine Q. Howe and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

William T. Wojtach

9 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William T. Wojtach United States	6	179	35	26	26	19	9	207
Erin Goddard Australia	11	319 1.8×	55 1.6×	35 1.3×	33 1.3×	31 1.6×	28	360
Toni Saarela Finland	8	262 1.5×	36 1.0×	58 2.2×	36 1.4×	16 0.8×	23	301
Krishna Srihasam United States	8	292 1.6×	39 1.1×	55 2.1×	48 1.8×	12 0.6×	10	356
Juraj Mesík United States	8	252 1.4×	29 0.8×	22 0.8×	36 1.4×	12 0.6×	16	280
Deborah Ross United States	10	291 1.6×	31 0.9×	9 0.3×	52 2.0×	40 2.1×	12	328
Jason Webster United States	2	250 1.4×	33 0.9×	35 1.3×	47 1.8×	10 0.5×	5	263
Ruben S. van Bergen Netherlands	7	366 2.0×	24 0.7×	20 0.8×	67 2.6×	38 2.0×	10	409
Michael Plöchl Germany	5	261 1.5×	36 1.0×	18 0.7×	43 1.7×	21 1.1×	6	302
Jocelyn L. Sy United States	10	335 1.9×	43 1.2×	11 0.4×	41 1.6×	20 1.1×	22	375
Ariella V. Popple United States	11	378 2.1×	30 0.9×	55 2.1×	42 1.6×	18 0.9×	20	394

Countries citing papers authored by William T. Wojtach

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Wojtach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Wojtach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Wojtach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Wojtach

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Wojtach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Wojtach. The network helps show where William T. Wojtach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Wojtach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Wojtach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Wojtach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Wojtach. William T. Wojtach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Purves, Dale, Yaniv Morgenstern, & William T. Wojtach. (2015). Perception and Reality: Why a Wholly Empirical Paradigm is Needed to Understand Vision. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 9. 156–156. 29 indexed citations

2.

Purves, Dale, Yaniv Morgenstern, & William T. Wojtach. (2015). Will understanding vision require a wholly empirical paradigm?. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1072–1072. 2 indexed citations

3.

Purves, Dale, Brian B. Monson, Janani Sundararajan, & William T. Wojtach. (2014). How biological vision succeeds in the physical world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(13). 4750–4755. 39 indexed citations

4.

Purves, Dale, William T. Wojtach, & R. Beau Lotto. (2011). Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(supplement_3). 15588–15595. 77 indexed citations

5.

Wojtach, William T., et al.. (2009). An Empirical Explanation of the Speed-Distance Effect. PLoS ONE. 4(8). e6771–e6771. 5 indexed citations

6.

Wojtach, William T.. (2009). Reconsidering Perceptual Content. Philosophy of Science. 76(1). 22–43. 2 indexed citations

7.

Wojtach, William T., et al.. (2008). An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105(42). 16338–16343. 39 indexed citations

8.

Purves, Dale, William T. Wojtach, & Catherine Q. Howe. (2008). Visual illusions: An Empirical Explanation. Scholarpedia. 3(6). 3706–3706. 4 indexed citations

9.

Wojtach, William T., et al.. (2008). An empirical explanation of aperture effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106(1). 298–303. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact