William T. Slack
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Aquatic Science top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Water Science and Technology
- Co-authors
- Mark S. PetersonNancy J. Brown‐PetersonChrista M. WoodleyStephen T. RossPamela J. SchofieldMichael R. LoweGretchen L. GrammerJennifer L. McDonald
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (44 papers)Marine and fisheries research (19 papers)Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (15 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEBioScienceCopeia
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
William T. Slack
48 papers receiving 803 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 553
- Ecology 498
- Aquatic Science 350
- Global and Planetary Change 238
- Water Science and Technology 64
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Slack
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Slack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Slack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Slack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Slack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Slack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Slack. The network helps show where William T. Slack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Slack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Slack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Slack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Slack. William T. Slack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Conservation Plan for the Interior Least Tern, Pallid Sturgeon, and Fat Pocketbook Mussel in the Lower Mississippi River (Endangered Species Act, Section 7(a)(1)) | 4 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 123 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 59 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About William T. Slack
William T. Slack is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science and Ecology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 857 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (44 papers), Marine and fisheries research (19 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (350 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (553 citations) and Ecology (498 citations). William T. Slack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark S. Peterson, Nancy J. Brown‐Peterson, Christa M. Woodley, Stephen T. Ross, Pamela J. Schofield, Michael R. Lowe, Gretchen L. Grammer, Jennifer L. McDonald, Christopher M. Taylor and Robert S. Pomeroy. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BioScience and Copeia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.