William Streever

681 total citations
28 papers, 480 citations indexed

About

William Streever is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Earth-Surface Processes. According to data from OpenAlex, William Streever has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 480 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Earth-Surface Processes. Recurrent topics in William Streever's work include Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (12 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). William Streever is often cited by papers focused on Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (12 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). William Streever collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. William Streever's co-authors include Thomas L. Crisman, Deborah J. Shafer, Andrew Searles, Thomas H. Stevens, David Evans, Edward J. Perkins, Michael Cole, Herbert L. Fredrickson, Kenneth M. Portier and Johan F. Gottgens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Aquatic Botany and Restoration Ecology.

In The Last Decade

William Streever

27 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Streever United States 12 353 104 80 75 72 28 480
Marnita Chintala United States 15 371 1.1× 258 2.5× 67 0.8× 77 1.0× 62 0.9× 22 604
Gaea E. Crozier United States 8 317 0.9× 106 1.0× 105 1.3× 33 0.4× 46 0.6× 11 401
Y. Schaeffer‐Novelli Brazil 7 334 0.9× 158 1.5× 139 1.7× 59 0.8× 66 0.9× 10 593
Mark Ford United States 10 597 1.7× 174 1.7× 169 2.1× 69 0.9× 170 2.4× 11 682
Pamela A. Morgan United States 7 349 1.0× 90 0.9× 60 0.8× 45 0.6× 92 1.3× 18 462
Richard D. Rheinhardt United States 15 484 1.4× 212 2.0× 193 2.4× 114 1.5× 25 0.3× 27 709
J. Pat Doody United Kingdom 8 367 1.0× 136 1.3× 53 0.7× 172 2.3× 264 3.7× 13 608
Sigrid D. P. Smith United States 12 219 0.6× 182 1.8× 176 2.2× 35 0.5× 17 0.2× 16 525
L. Valdés Spain 10 420 1.2× 281 2.7× 74 0.9× 67 0.9× 43 0.6× 14 665
Hem Nalini Morzaria‐Luna United States 16 454 1.3× 372 3.6× 139 1.7× 120 1.6× 54 0.8× 41 735

Countries citing papers authored by William Streever

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Streever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Streever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Streever more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Streever

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Streever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Streever. The network helps show where William Streever may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Streever

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Streever. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Streever based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Streever. William Streever is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Streever, William, et al.. (2010). Short term changes in flushing of tidal creeks following culvert removal. 15(1). 22–22. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bosch, Darrell J., William J. Mitsch, Leonard Shabman, et al.. (2004). Lessons learned by the National Technical Review Committee for the Louisiana Coastal Area Study. Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution). 1 indexed citations
3.
Streever, William, et al.. (2003). Evaluation of Percent Cover Requirements for Revegetation of Disturbed Sites on Alaska's North Slope. ARCTIC. 56(3). 8 indexed citations
4.
Streever, William, et al.. (2002). Decomposition of Sarcocornia quinqueflora on an Iron‐Smelting Slag Substrate. Restoration Ecology. 10(1). 11–15. 1 indexed citations
5.
Streever, William, et al.. (2001). Decomposition of Avicennia marina on an iron‐smelting slag substrate. Austral Ecology. 26(2). 127–131. 4 indexed citations
6.
Shafer, Deborah J. & William Streever. (2000). A comparison of 28 natural and dredged material salt marshes in Texas with an emphasis on geomorphological variables. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 8(5). 353–366. 39 indexed citations
7.
Streever, William. (1999). An International Perspective on Wetland Rehabilitation. 92 indexed citations
8.
Streever, William, et al.. (1998). A closed chamber CO2 flux method for estimating marsh productivity. Aquatic Botany. 62(1). 33–44. 12 indexed citations
9.
Streever, William. (1998). Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project: opportunities and constraints in an urban wetland rehabilitation project. Urban Ecosystems. 2(4). 205–218. 11 indexed citations
10.
Streever, William, et al.. (1997). Effect of Improved Tidal Flushing and Competitive Interactions at the Boundary between Salt Marsh and Pasture. Estuaries. 20(4). 807–807. 24 indexed citations
11.
Streever, William. (1997). Trends in Australian wetland rehabilitation. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 5(1). 5–18. 27 indexed citations
12.
Crisman, Thomas L., et al.. (1997). An Evaluation of Plant Community Structure, Fish and Benthic Meio- and Macrofauna as Success Criteria for Reclaimed Wetlands. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 1 indexed citations
13.
Crisman, Thomas L. & William Streever. (1996). The Legacy and Future of Tropical Limnology. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 27–42. 6 indexed citations
14.
Streever, William, et al.. (1996). Constructing freshwater wetlands to replace impacted natural wetlands: a subtropical perspective.. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 295–303. 3 indexed citations
15.
Streever, William, et al.. (1996). A comparison of dipterans from ten created and ten natural wetlands. Wetlands. 16(4). 416–428. 33 indexed citations
16.
Streever, William, et al.. (1994). Cave Fauna Distribution within Fully-Flooded Cave Systems in Florida. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 9(3). 171–174. 5 indexed citations
17.
Streever, William, et al.. (1994). A computer program to assist with sampling design in the comparison of natural and constructed wetlands. Wetlands. 14(3). 199–205. 7 indexed citations
18.
Streever, William & Thomas L. Crisman. (1993). A preliminary comparison of meiobenthic cladoceran assemblages in natural and constructed wetlands in central Florida. Wetlands. 13(4). 229–236. 12 indexed citations
19.
Streever, William, et al.. (1993). The Self-Similarity Curve: a New Method of Determining the Sampling Effort Required to Characterize Communities. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 8(4). 401–403. 5 indexed citations
20.
Streever, William & Thomas L. Crisman. (1993). A Comparison of Fish Populations from Natural and Constructed Freshwater Marshes in Central Florida. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 8(2). 149–153. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026