William Starch

23 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

William Starch
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Condensed Matter Physics 210
  • Biomedical Engineering 359
  • Aerospace Engineering 199
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 26
  • Materials Chemistry 92
Replace M. Dhallé with:
M. Dhallé Netherlands
Charlie Sanabria United States
S. Wessel Netherlands
Guangli Kuang China
R. Prokopec Austria
R.M. Scanlan United States
Y. Nabara Japan
A. Anemona Italy
V. Tronza France
Wouter Abbas Netherlands
William Starch relative to M. Dhallé Netherlands M. Dhallé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
M. Dhallé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Starch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Starch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Starch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Starch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Starch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Starch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Starch. The network helps show where William Starch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Starch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Starch Line = papers co-authored together William Starch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201192
2 201248
3 202227
4 198527
5 201523
6 201523
7 201622
8 201622
9 201121
10 201920
11 201917
12 201815
13 198512
14 201211
15 19999
16 20169
17 19995
18 20244
19
引抜きおよび圧延PITおよびRRP Nb 3 Snワイヤにおけるフィラメント歪とRRR(残留抵抗比)劣化との相関
20162
20 20242

About William Starch

William Starch is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (21 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (7 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (6 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (4 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (3 papers) and Copper Interconnects and Reliability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (210 citations), Biomedical Engineering (359 citations), Aerospace Engineering (199 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (26 citations) and Materials Chemistry (92 citations). William Starch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include D. C. Larbalestier, Peter J. Lee, A. Devred, Charlie Sanabria, U.P. Trociewitz, Jianyi Jiang, E. E. Hellstrom, Fumitake Kametani, Matthew C. Jewell and Ian Pong. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Scientific Reports, Journal of Alloys and Compounds and Journal of Material Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact