William Speier

2.8k citations
90 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 27

William Speier

83 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

William Speier
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Health Informatics 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 412
  • Human-Computer Interaction 101
  • Health Information Management 84
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 384
Replace Corey Arnold with:
Corey Arnold United States
Pieter Kubben Netherlands
Gilles Wainrib France
Peter Charlton United Kingdom
Jasjit S. Suri United States
G. Anthony Reina United States
Yali Zheng China
Seyed‐Ahmad Ahmadi Germany
Daniel Morillo Spain
Richard J. Chen United States
William Speier relative to Corey Arnold United States Corey Arnold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Corey Arnold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Speier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Speier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Speier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Speier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Speier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Speier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Speier. The network helps show where William Speier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Speier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Speier Line = papers co-authored together William Speier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20252
3 20250
4 20245
5 20249
6 20245
7 20241
8 20244
9 20245
10 202310
11 20231
12 202212
13 202238
14 202127
15 20207
16 201939
17 201923
18
Semi-supervised learning based on generative adversarial network: a comparison between good GAN and bad GAN approach
20191
19 20199
20 201643

About William Speier

William Speier is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Family Practice, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (24 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (10 papers), AI in cancer detection (9 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (8 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (86 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (412 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (101 citations), Health Information Management (84 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (384 citations). William Speier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Corey Arnold, Nader Pouratian, King Chung Ho, J. Robert Beck, Suzie El‐Saden, Jiayun Li, Jessica R. Lu, Michael Ong, Wenyuan Li and Alan Pollack. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of Neural Engineering, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Bioinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026