William S. Smock

18 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

William S. Smock
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Emergency Medicine 89
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 84
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 69
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 55
  • Surgery 44
Replace Gürol Cantürk with:
Gürol Cantürk Türkiye
B Blackbourne United States
Đjorđje Alempijević Serbia
Guy Norfolk United Kingdom
Garry Peterson United States
Mary Jo Bowman United States
Amy E. Austin Australia
Diane Nuttall United Kingdom
Caitlin A. Farrell United States
Dirk Huyer Canada
William S. Smock relative to Gürol Cantürk Türkiye Gürol Cantürk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Gürol Cantürk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William S. Smock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Smock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Smock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Smock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Smock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Smock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Smock. The network helps show where William S. Smock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Smock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Smock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Smock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Smock. William S. Smock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Florida Domestic Violence
1
2 13
3
Kentucky Domestic Violence
4
4
Conducted-Energy Device (Taser) Usage in Subjects With Mental Illness.
4
5 1
6 6
7
Responding to sexual violence: critical issues for healthcare providers.
1
8
Forensic medicine : clinical and pathological aspects
108
9
Implementation of a crisis intervention program for police response to mental health emergencies in Louisville.
7
10 4
11 7
12 62
13 19
14 17
15 2
16
Traumatic avulsion of the first digit secondary to air bag deployment
1
17 5
18 10

About William S. Smock

William S. Smock is a scholar working on Health, Pharmacy and Emergency Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (89 citations), Ophthalmology (40 citations) and Health (37 citations). William S. Smock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Busuttil, Jason Payne‐James, George R. Nichols, Peter M. Fuller, Donald F. Huelke, Rif S. El‐Mallakh, Martin Huecker, Matthew C. Bozeman, Glen A. Franklin and Cassandra Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Annals of Emergency Medicine and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026