Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Settlement of the Americas: A Comparison of the Linguistic, Dental, and Genetic Evidence [and Comments and Reply]
1986300 citationsWilliam S. Laughlin et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Laughlin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Laughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Laughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Laughlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Laughlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Laughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Laughlin. The network helps show where William S. Laughlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Laughlin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Laughlin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Laughlin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Laughlin. William S. Laughlin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thompson, David D., Elizabeth M. Salter, & William S. Laughlin. (1981). Bone Core Analysis of Baffin Island Skeletons. Arctic Anthropology. 18(1). 87–96.10 indexed citations
Laughlin, William S.. (1979). PROBLEMS IN THE PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS, ESKIMOS AND ALEUTS. Arctic Anthropology. 16(1). 165–177.1 indexed citations
Laughlin, William S.. (1966). Paleo-Aleut Crania from Port Moller, Alaska Peninsula. Arctic Anthropology. 3(2). 159–159.1 indexed citations
11.
Laughlin, William S. & Jean S. Aigner. (1966). Preliminary Analysis of the Anangula Unifacial Core and Blade Industry. Arctic Anthropology. 3(2). 41–56.11 indexed citations
12.
Laughlin, William S. & William G. Reeder. (1966). Studies in Aleutian-Kodiak Prehistory, Ecology and Anthropology. Arctic Anthropology. 3(2). 1–240.6 indexed citations
13.
McCartney, Allen P. & William S. Laughlin. (1964). Earliest Aleutian Prehistory: the Anangula Island Core and Blade Site.
Laughlin, William S. & William G. Reeder. (1962). Rationale for the Collaborative Investigation of Aleut-Konyag Prehistory and Ecology. Arctic Anthropology. 1(1). 104–107.6 indexed citations
16.
Laughlin, William S.. (1962). Archaeological Investigations On Umnak Island, Aleutians. Arctic Anthropology. 1(1). 108–110.2 indexed citations
17.
Laughlin, William S., et al.. (1960). Blood groups of Caddoan Indians of Oklahoma.. PubMed Central. 12. 86–94.13 indexed citations
18.
Laughlin, William S.. (1958). Neo-Aleut and Paleo-Aleut Prehistory.3 indexed citations
Laughlin, William S.. (1952). Contemporary Problems in the Anthropology of Southern Alaska. 122. 47–48.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.