Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Settlement of the Americas: A Comparison of the Linguistic, Dental, and Genetic Evidence [and Comments and Reply]
1986300 citationsJoseph Greenberg, Christy G. Turner et al.Current Anthropologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Woolford
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Woolford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Woolford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Woolford more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Woolford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Woolford. The network helps show where Ellen Woolford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen Woolford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen Woolford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen Woolford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen Woolford. Ellen Woolford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Woolford, Ellen. (2020). Conditions on Object Agreement in Ruwund (Bantu). ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst).
2.
Woolford, Ellen. (2015). Ergativity and Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry. 46(3). 489–531.12 indexed citations
3.
Woolford, Ellen. (2013). Aspect Splits and Parasitic Marking. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 166–192.2 indexed citations
4.
Woolford, Ellen. (2008). Is Agreement Really Independent of Case in Choctaw.2 indexed citations
5.
Woolford, Ellen. (2008). Active-Stative Agreement in Lakota: Person and Number Alignment and Portmanteau Formation.4 indexed citations
6.
Woolford, Ellen. (2007). Introduction to OT syntax. 119–134.2 indexed citations
7.
Brandner, Ellen, Heike Zinsmeister, Άρτεμις Αλεξιάδου, et al.. (2003). New perspectives on case theory.80 indexed citations
8.
Woolford, Ellen, Ellen Brandner, Maria Gouskova, et al.. (2003). Nominative Objects and Case Locality. 11(4). 221–34.5 indexed citations
Woolford, Ellen. (1993). Symmetric and asymmetric passives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 11(4). 679–728.46 indexed citations
13.
Woolford, Ellen. (1991). Two Subject Positions in Lango. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 17(2). 231–231.4 indexed citations
Greenberg, Joseph, Christy G. Turner, Stephen L. Zegura, et al.. (1986). The Settlement of the Americas: A Comparison of the Linguistic, Dental, and Genetic Evidence [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 27(5). 477–497.300 indexed citations breakdown →
Woolford, Ellen. (1979). Aspects of Tok Pisin grammar. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).2 indexed citations
20.
Woolford, Ellen. (1978). Topicalization and Clefting Without wh-Movement. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 8(1). 21.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.