William S. Cohen

35 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

William S. Cohen
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Molecular Biology 217
  • Plant Science 122
  • Political Science and International Relations 65
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 58
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 49
Replace Mark M. Anderson with:
Mark M. Anderson United States
Jeffrey P. Osborne United States
Klaus Masson Germany
S.G. Reeves United Kingdom
R. L. Pan United States
Leonard E. Fish United States
Henrik Laasch Germany
R. P. F. Gregory United Kingdom
Edwin W. Smith United States
Martin Vink Sweden
William S. Cohen relative to Mark M. Anderson United States Mark M. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Mark M. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William S. Cohen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Cohen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Cohen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Cohen. The network helps show where William S. Cohen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Cohen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Cohen. William S. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 1
3
A congressional view of the cycle of violence
2
4
Healthy Schools, Healthy Children, Healthy Futures: The Role of the Federal Government in Promoting Health through the Schools. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate.
2
5 5
6
Report of the Secretary of Defense to the President and the Congress
19
7 3
8 2
9 4
10 15
11 0
12 16
13 4
14 8
15 27
16 5
17 9
18 30
19 7
20 5

About William S. Cohen

William S. Cohen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (22 papers), Light effects on plants (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (122 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (58 citations) and Molecular Biology (217 citations). William S. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Louis A. Sherman, Walter F. Bertsch, Gerald A. Rosenthal, Kelsey R. Downum, André T. Jagendorf, John Whitmarsh, C. E. Rieck, James E. White, William J. Perry and John M. Rawls. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026