William Ruger

659 citations
13 papers · 367 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Ruger

13 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

William Ruger
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Development 24
  • Political Science and International Relations 155
  • Sociology and Political Science 201
  • Economics and Econometrics 107
  • Gender Studies 32
Replace Cheol-Sung Lee with:
Cheol-Sung Lee United States
Agustina Giraudy United States
Maria Rost Rublee Australia
Jennifer Pribble United States
Margaret E. Peters United States
Jana Morgan United States
Heléne Lundqvist Sweden
Alessandro Pellegata Italy
Matthew C. Wilson United States
Bryce Quillin United Kingdom
William Ruger relative to Cheol-Sung Lee United States Cheol-Sung Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Cheol-Sung Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Ruger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ruger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ruger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ruger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ruger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ruger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ruger. The network helps show where William Ruger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside William Ruger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Ruger Line = papers co-authored together William Ruger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000116
2 200854
3 200945
4 200245
5 201328
6 201224
7 201416
8 202010
9 20149
10 20138
11 20135
12 20205
13
Our Foreign Policy Choices: Rethinking America's Global Role
20162

About William Ruger

William Ruger is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Development, having authored 13 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corruption and Economic Development (4 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (2 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Economic Sanctions and International Relations (1 paper) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (24 citations), Political Science and International Relations (155 citations), Sociology and Political Science (201 citations), Economics and Econometrics (107 citations) and Gender Studies (32 citations). William Ruger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Jason Sorens, Michael C. Desch, Sven E. Wilson, Steven Yamarik, Noel D. Johnson, John Meadowcroft, Rajan Menon, Ted Galen Carpenter, Austin Long and Benjamin H. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Armed Forces & Society, Civil Wars, Review of Political Economy, The Journal of Military History and State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact