William Redmond
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Papers in
-
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 4
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
- Co-authors
- Philippe Goffaux (2 shared papers)Serge Marchand (2 shared papers)Pierre Rainville (1 shared paper)Mark Connor (4 shared papers)Natasha L. Grimsey (2 shared papers)Erin E. Cawston (2 shared papers)Michelle Glass (2 shared papers)Stéphane Potvin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2 papers)British Journal of Pharmacology (2 papers)Pain (1 paper)Current Medical Research and Opinion (1 paper)Clinical Proteomics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
William Redmond
11 papers receiving 546 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Pharmacology 287
- Cognitive Neuroscience 172
- Toxicology 29
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 138
- Orthodontics 31
Countries citing papers authored by William Redmond
This map shows the geographic impact of William Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Redmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Redmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Redmond. The network helps show where William Redmond may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 217 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 93 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 1 |
About William Redmond
William Redmond is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sensory Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (2 papers), Digital Imaging in Medicine (2 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (287 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (172 citations), Toxicology (29 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (138 citations) and Orthodontics (31 citations). William Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Goffaux, Serge Marchand, Pierre Rainville, Mark Connor, Natasha L. Grimsey, Erin E. Cawston, Michelle Glass, Stéphane Potvin, Christian Casanova and Bruno Cécyre. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, British Journal of Pharmacology, Pain, Current Medical Research and Opinion and Clinical Proteomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.