William R. Harms
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science
- Soil Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Craig D. WhitesellDean S. DeBellC. W. RalstonD. RichterHans T. SchreuderDonal D. HookClaud L. BrownC. C. Black
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (13 papers)Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William R. Harms
20 papers receiving 470 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Global and Planetary Change 365
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 296
- Ecology 176
- Plant Science 138
- Soil Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by William R. Harms
This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Harms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Harms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Harms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Harms
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Harms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Harms. The network helps show where William R. Harms may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Harms
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Harms. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Harms based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Harms. William R. Harms is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | The physiological diversity and similarity of ten Quercus species | 1 |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Effects of prescribed fire on water quality at the Santee Experimental Watersheds in South Carolina | 1 |
| 8 | Applying silvics to stand management | 1 |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | An empirical function for predicting survival over a wide range of densities | 5 |
| 11 | 104 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About William R. Harms
William R. Harms is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (296 citations), Global and Planetary Change (365 citations) and Soil Science (106 citations). William R. Harms has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig D. Whitesell, Dean S. DeBell, C. W. Ralston, D. Richter, Hans T. Schreuder, Donal D. Hook, Claud L. Brown, C. C. Black, Paul P. Kormanik and Daniel D. Richter. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Ecology and Water Resources Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.