William Mook

61 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

William Mook
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Ceramics and Composites 190
  • Materials Chemistry 1.3k
  • Mechanics of Materials 661
  • Structural Biology 31
  • Mechanical Engineering 696
Replace Xiaozhi Wu with:
Xiaozhi Wu China
U. Welzel Germany
Kevin M. Knowles United Kingdom
Samuel T. Murphy United Kingdom
Sandip Bysakh India
Benoit Merle Germany
Kui Du China
Shuangxi Song China
Philippe Steyer France
J. Esteve Spain
William Mook relative to Xiaozhi Wu China Xiaozhi Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Xiaozhi Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Mook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Mook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Mook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Mook. The network helps show where William Mook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Mook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Mook Line = papers co-authored together William Mook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003177
2 2013145
3 2014138
4 2007136
5 200795
6 201592
7 200990
8 200581
9 200662
10 202059
11 200558
12 201253
13 200950
14 201342
15 201642
16 201440
17 201538
18 200636
19 201935
20 201034

About William Mook

William Mook is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (29 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (15 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (12 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (9 papers), Advanced materials and composites (6 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (190 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.3k citations), Mechanics of Materials (661 citations), Structural Biology (31 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (696 citations). William Mook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. Barry Carter, Steven L. Girshick, Johann Michler, W. W. Gerberich, W. W. Gerberich, Christopher R. Perrey, Nathan A. Mara, Rajesh Mukherjee, Jian Wang and Shijian Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, Microscopy and Microanalysis, Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources, The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact