William Malcolm

68 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William Malcolm
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 445
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 86
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 426
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 98
  • Gastroenterology 93
Replace Cary Thurm with:
Cary Thurm United States
Paul D. van der Linden Netherlands
Douglas Steinke United Kingdom
Mohamad Al‐Tannir Saudi Arabia
Joseph Fadare Nigeria
David M. Jacobs United States
David Ratz United States
Thierry Christiaens Belgium
Noel Cranswick Australia
Dingwei Dai United States
William Malcolm relative to Cary Thurm United States Cary Thurm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Cary Thurm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Malcolm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Malcolm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Malcolm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Malcolm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Malcolm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Malcolm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Malcolm. The network helps show where William Malcolm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Malcolm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Malcolm Line = papers co-authored together William Malcolm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011124
2 200990
3 200780
4 201176
5 202070
6 202060
7 201356
8 201856
9 202041
10 201339
11 200939
12 201236
13 201935
14 202035
15 201632
16 201931
17 201930
18 201229
19 202326
20 202024

About William Malcolm

William Malcolm is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (32 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (14 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (12 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (8 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (8 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (7 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (445 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (86 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (426 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (98 citations) and Gastroenterology (93 citations). William Malcolm has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include C. Michael Cotten, Ricki F. Goldstein, P. Brian Smith, Jacqueline Sneddon, Ronald N. Goldberg, Dilip Nathwani, Diane Holditch‐Davis, Andrea Patton, Susan G. Silva and Debra Brandon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Journal of Perinatology, Early Human Development, Journal of Hospital Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact