William L. Stone

3.6k citations
93 papers · 2.8k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

William L. Stone

92 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

William L. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Biochemistry 660
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 557
  • Biochemistry 218
  • Rehabilitation 128
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
Replace C. Di Giacomo with:
C. Di Giacomo Italy
Werner Siems Germany
A. Vanella Italy
Valeria Sorrenti Italy
Helen Wiseman United Kingdom
B. Descomps France
Lawrence J. Machlin United States
Mitsuyoshi Matsuo Japan
Marina Sánchéz‐Hidalgo Spain
Lucia Marcocci Italy
William L. Stone relative to C. Di Giacomo Italy C. Di Giacomo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
C. Di Giacomo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Stone. The network helps show where William L. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William L. Stone Line = papers co-authored together William L. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979200
2 2003140
3 1997121
4 2003116
5
Fluorescent pigment accumulation in retinal pigment epithelium of antioxidant-deficient rats.
1978104
6
Sulfur mustard toxicity following dermal exposure: role of oxidative stress, and antioxidant therapy.
2007100
7 200399
8 200678
9 200872
10 201170
11 200367
12 197767
13 201465
14 197558
15 201558
16 200456
17 200854
18 200453
19 201441
20 197940

About William L. Stone

William L. Stone is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biochemistry, Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (27 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (11 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (11 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (11 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (10 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (10 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (7 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (660 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (557 citations), Biochemistry (218 citations), Rehabilitation (128 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.2k citations). William L. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include E.A. Dratz, Milton G. Smith, Koyamangalath Krishnan, Min Qui, Sharon Campbell, Christopher C. Farnsworth, Andreas M. Papas, Sarah Whaley, Hongsong Yang and Victor Paromov. Their work appears in journals such as Free Radical Biology and Medicine, BMC Cancer, Frontiers in bioscience, Antioxidants and BMC Cell Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact