William L. Peacock

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

William L. Peacock is a scholar working on Microbiology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, William L. Peacock has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Microbiology, 3 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in William L. Peacock's work include Reproductive tract infections research (10 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (9 papers) and Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (2 papers). William L. Peacock is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive tract infections research (10 papers), Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (9 papers) and Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (2 papers). William L. Peacock collaborates with scholars based in United States and Thailand. William L. Peacock's co-authors include W. E. Deacon, Douglas S. Kellogg, Carl I. Pirkle, Ad Harris, James D. Thayer, John D. Schmale, R J Arko, Edwin P. Ewing, C S Callaway and John E. Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Bacteriology and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

William L. Peacock

17 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE I

1963 1.1k citations Douglas S. Kellogg, William L. Peacock et al. Journal of Bacteriology profile →

Peers

William L. Peacock

MICRO

EPIDE

GENET

ENDOC

Carl I. Pirkle United States

W. E. Deacon United States

G D Biswas United States

Eirik Holten Norway

J Y Tai United States

Daniel J. Morton United States

Jerry M. Keith United States

Scott S. Grieshaber United States

M. Achtman Germany

Ming H. Yuk United States

Carl I. Pirkle United States

William L. Peacock

814 ×0.8

MICRO

269 ×0.9

240 ×0.8

EPIDE

170 ×1.0

GENET

101 ×0.6

ENDOC

Citations per year, relative to William L. Peacock William L. Peacock (= 1×) peers Carl I. Pirkle

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Peacock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Peacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Peacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Peacock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Peacock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Peacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Peacock. The network helps show where William L. Peacock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Peacock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Peacock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Peacock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Peacock. William L. Peacock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Peacock, William L., et al.. (1981). Ligionella pneumophila: Avirulent to virulent conversion through passage in cultured human embryonic lung fibroblasts. Current Microbiology. 5(1). 31–34. 28 indexed citations

Ewing, Edwin P., et al.. (1980). Intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila in cultured human embryonic lung fibroblasts. Infection and Immunity. 28(3). 1014–1018. 37 indexed citations

Arko, R J, K. H. Wong, & William L. Peacock. (1979). Nuclease enhancement of specific cell agglutination in a serodiagnostic test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 9(4). 517–519. 7 indexed citations

Arko, R J, et al.. (1976). Immunity in Infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Duration and Serological Response in the Chimpanzee. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 133(4). 436–440. 36 indexed citations

Peacock, William L.. (1970). Method for Preparing Neisseria gonorrhoeae Fluorescent Antibody Conjugate. Public Health Reports (1896-1970). 85(8). 733–733. 7 indexed citations

Schmale, John D., Dan Danielsson, Joseph F. Smith, Linda Lee, & William L. Peacock. (1969). Isolation of an Antigen of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Involved in the Human Immune Response to Gonococcal Infection. Journal of Bacteriology. 99(2). 469–471. 11 indexed citations

Danielsson, Dan, John D. Schmale, William L. Peacock, & James D. Thayer. (1969). Antigens of Neisseria gonorrhoeae : Characterization by Gel Filtration, Complement Fixation, and Agar-Gel Diffusion of Antigens of Gonococcal Protoplasm. Journal of Bacteriology. 97(3). 1012–1017. 14 indexed citations

Martin, John E., William L. Peacock, Gilbert Reising, et al.. (1969). Preparation of Cell Walls and Protoplasm of Neisseria with the Ribi Cell Fractionator. Journal of Bacteriology. 97(3). 1009–1011. 10 indexed citations

Peacock, William L. & John D. Schmale. (1969). Toxic Constituents of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nature. 221(5182). 760–761. 9 indexed citations

10.

Peacock, William L., et al.. (1968). Fluorescent Antibody Technique for Identification of Presumptively Positive Gonococcal Cultures. Public Health Reports (1896-1970). 83(4). 337–337. 18 indexed citations

11.

Martin, John E., William L. Peacock, & James D. Thayer. (1965). Further studies with a selective medium for cultivating Neisseria gonorrhoeae.. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 41(3). 199–201. 15 indexed citations

12.

Peacock, William L. & James D. Thayer. (1964). Direct FA Technique Using Flazo Orange Counterstain in Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Public Health Reports (1896-1970). 79(12). 1119–1119. 5 indexed citations

13.

Kellogg, Douglas S., et al.. (1963). NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE I. Journal of Bacteriology. 85(6). 1274–1279. 1051 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Peacock, William L., et al.. (1962). Study of gonorrhea in treated and untreated asymptomatic women as determined by fluorescent antibody and culture methods. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 84(6). 753–757. 11 indexed citations

15.

Harris, Ad, et al.. (1961). Fluorescent Antibody Method of Detecting Gonorrhea in Asymptomatic Females. Public Health Reports (1896-1970). 76(2). 93–93. 10 indexed citations

16.

Deacon, W. E., et al.. (1960). Fluorescent Antibody Tests for Detection of the Gonococcus in Women. Public Health Reports (1896-1970). 75(2). 125–125. 46 indexed citations

17.

Deacon, W. E., et al.. (1959). Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Means of Fluorescent Antibodies. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 101(2). 322–325. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact