William L. Mock

5.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
84 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

William L. Mock is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, William L. Mock has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Organic Chemistry, 23 papers in Molecular Biology and 20 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in William L. Mock's work include Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (20 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (15 papers) and Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (13 papers). William L. Mock is often cited by papers focused on Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (20 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (15 papers) and Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (13 papers). William L. Mock collaborates with scholars based in United States. William L. Mock's co-authors include N.‐Y. SHIH, James P. Wepsiec, E. J. Corey, Daniel J. Pasto, T. Manimaran, Yaya Liu, Keith Boyer, J T Tsay, Heng Cheng and Hwei‐Ru Tsou and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

William L. Mock

83 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

Cucurbituril 1981 2026 1996 2011 1981 1986 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William L. Mock United States 26 3.2k 1.7k 1.4k 767 730 84 4.1k
Luigi Mandolini Italy 37 4.7k 1.5× 2.0k 1.2× 672 0.5× 1.7k 2.2× 1.5k 2.1× 176 6.5k
Erich Kleinpeter Germany 33 4.3k 1.3× 1.6k 0.9× 759 0.6× 732 1.0× 715 1.0× 405 5.6k
Yōji Umezawa Japan 26 1.8k 0.6× 895 0.5× 1.3k 1.0× 1.2k 1.6× 765 1.0× 54 4.0k
Placido Neri Italy 35 3.3k 1.0× 2.0k 1.2× 891 0.7× 1.1k 1.4× 1.4k 1.9× 205 4.4k
Kazuhiko Saigo Japan 41 4.6k 1.4× 1.4k 0.8× 835 0.6× 1.4k 1.9× 1.8k 2.5× 325 6.8k
Pilar Prados Spain 30 2.1k 0.7× 1.9k 1.1× 517 0.4× 949 1.2× 1.1k 1.5× 80 3.3k
Alexander Shivanyuk Ukraine 35 2.7k 0.8× 1.6k 0.9× 995 0.7× 662 0.9× 894 1.2× 110 3.4k
Fraser Hof Canada 34 2.3k 0.7× 1.6k 0.9× 882 0.7× 1.5k 1.9× 933 1.3× 98 4.1k
Emmanuel A. Meyer Switzerland 16 2.0k 0.6× 970 0.6× 1.7k 1.3× 1.4k 1.8× 987 1.4× 27 4.5k
R. Parthasarathy United States 23 1.1k 0.4× 525 0.3× 1.5k 1.1× 774 1.0× 774 1.1× 85 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Mock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Mock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Mock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Mock. The network helps show where William L. Mock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Mock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Mock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Mock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Mock. William L. Mock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mock, William L., et al.. (2002). Anisylazoformylarginine: A superior assay substrate for carboxypeptidase B type enzymes. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 12(8). 1193–1194. 17 indexed citations
2.
Mock, William L. & Donghong Xu. (1999). Catalytic activity of carboxypeptidase B and of carboxypeptidase Y with anisylazoformyl substrates. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 9(2). 187–192. 12 indexed citations
3.
Mock, William L. & Lingyan Wang. (1999). Synergistic Inhibition of Carboxypeptidase A by Zinc Ion and Imidazole. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 257(1). 239–243. 6 indexed citations
4.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1996). Arazoformyl Peptide Surrogates as Spectrophotometric Kinetic Assay Substrates for Carboxypeptidase A. Analytical Biochemistry. 239(2). 218–222. 42 indexed citations
5.
Mock, William L. & Yaya Liu. (1995). Hydrolysis of Picolinylprolines by Prolidase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 270(31). 18437–18446. 19 indexed citations
6.
Mock, William L. & Yaya Liu. (1995). Inhibition of prolidase by phosphoenolpyruvate is biphasic. avoidance of endogenous-metabolite inactivation by cooperativity within an enzyme dimer. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 5(6). 627–630. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mock, William L. & Hui Zhuang. (1991). Chemical modification locates guanidinyl and carboxylate groups within the active site of prolidase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 180(1). 401–406. 9 indexed citations
8.
Mock, William L. & N.‐Y. SHIH. (1988). Organic ligand-receptor interactions between cucurbituril and alkylammonium ions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 110(14). 4706–4710. 149 indexed citations
9.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1985). A novel hexacyclic ring system from glycoluril. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 50(1). 60–62. 17 indexed citations
10.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1983). Cycloaddition induced by cucurbituril. A case of Pauling principle catalysis. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 48(20). 3619–3620. 203 indexed citations
11.
Mock, William L. & Hwei‐Ru Tsou. (1981). Procedure for diethoxymethylation of ketones. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 46(12). 2557–2561. 20 indexed citations
12.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1976). Scope of the 1,6 addition of sulfur dioxide to cis-3-hexatrienes. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 41(2). 242–247. 5 indexed citations
13.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1975). Geometry of the adducts of 2,4-hexadienes with N-sulfinylarylsulfonamides. Stereospecific but nonconcerted Diels-Alder reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 97(22). 6521–6526. 22 indexed citations
14.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1974). Theory and application of photoelectron spectroscopy. 31. Through-conjugation through the sulfone group in 2,5-di-tert-butylthiophene 1,1-dioxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 96(1). 280–281. 7 indexed citations
15.
Mock, William L.. (1972). The reactivity of noncoplanar double bonds. Tetrahedron Letters. 13(6). 475–478. 23 indexed citations
16.
Mock, William L.. (1971). Stereoisomers of trimethyl methanetri(.alpha.-bromoacetate). The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 36(23). 3613–3614. 3 indexed citations
17.
Mock, William L., et al.. (1970). Higher‐Order Elastic Constants of the Inert Gas Solids. physica status solidi (b). 38(1). 317–324. 3 indexed citations
18.
Mock, William L.. (1970). Stable thiophene sulfoxides. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 92(26). 7610–7612. 47 indexed citations
19.
Anet, F. A. L., et al.. (1969). Observation of Ring Inversion in a Thiepin Dioxide by Low-Temperature 250-MHz Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 91(27). 7782–7783. 2 indexed citations
20.
Corey, E. J., William L. Mock, & Daniel J. Pasto. (1961). Chemistry of diimide. Some new systems for the hydrogenation of multiple bonds. Tetrahedron Letters. 2(11). 347–352. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026