William L. Duke
- Earth-Surface Processes top 0.5%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Paleontology top 2%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Geology top 2%
- Co-authors
- R. W. C. ArnottR. J. CheelAnthony R. PraveRoger G. WalkerDale A. LeckieDouglas D. BackousBrian J. LevineMatthew E. Carter
- Topics
- Geological formations and processes (12 papers)Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers)Coastal and Marine Dynamics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaKuwait
In The Last Decade
William L. Duke
15 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Earth-Surface Processes 893
- Atmospheric Science 689
- Paleontology 341
- Geophysics 214
- Geology 184
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Duke. The network helps show where William L. Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Duke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Duke. William L. Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 262 | |
| 5 | Storm- and Tide-Influenced Prograding Shoreline Sequences in the Middle Devonian Mahantango Formation, Pennsylvania | 10 |
| 6 | Geostrophic Circulation or Shallow Marine Turbidity Currents? The Dilemma of Paleoflow Patterns in Storm-Influenced Prograding Shoreline Systems | 63 |
| 7 | 120 | |
| 8 | 81 | |
| 9 | An Outcrop to Subsurface Correlation of the Cardium Formation in Alberta | 16 |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | Origin of Hummocky Cross-Stratification: Part 2. Paleohydraulic Analysis Indicates Formation by Orbital Ripples Within the Wave-Formed Flat-Bed Field: Abstract | 2 |
| 12 | 307 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 118 |
About William L. Duke
William L. Duke is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science and Paleontology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological formations and processes (12 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers) and Coastal and Marine Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (893 citations), Paleontology (341 citations) and Atmospheric Science (689 citations). William L. Duke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Kuwait. Frequent co-authors include R. W. C. Arnott, R. J. Cheel, Anthony R. Prave, Roger G. Walker, Dale A. Leckie, Douglas D. Backous, Brian J. Levine, Matthew E. Carter, Nitsan Goldstein and A. Guy Plint. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Geology and Geological Society of America Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.