This map shows the geographic impact of William Kent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Kent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Kent more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Kent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Kent. The network helps show where William Kent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Kent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Kent.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Kent based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Kent. William Kent is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kent, William. (2003). The unsolvable identity problem..3 indexed citations
2.
Kent, William, et al.. (1995). The OMG object model. 18–41.11 indexed citations
3.
Annevelink, J., et al.. (1995). Object SQL—a language for the design and implementation of object databases. 42–68.1 indexed citations
4.
Shan, Ming-Chien, et al.. (1995). Pegasus: a heterogeneous information management system. 664–682.19 indexed citations
5.
Meersman, Robert, et al.. (1991). Object-Oriented Databases: Analysis, Design and Construction. Elsevier eBooks.11 indexed citations
6.
Kent, William. (1991). Solving Domain Mismatch and Schema Mismatch Problems with an Object-Oriented Database Programming Language. Very Large Data Bases. 147–160.37 indexed citations
7.
Meersman, Robert, et al.. (1991). Object-oriented databases : analysis, design & construction (DS-4) : proceedings of the IFIP TC2/WG 2.6 Working Conference on Object-Oriented Databases : Analysis, Design & Construction, Windermere, United Kingdom, 2-6 July, 1990. Elsevier eBooks.2 indexed citations
8.
Kent, William. (1990). The Evolving Role of Database in Object Systems.. 1–9.
9.
Fishman, Daniel, James W. Davis, David Beech, et al.. (1990). Overview of the IRIS DBMS. Prentice-Hall, Inc eBooks. 174–199.48 indexed citations
10.
Fishman, Daniel, David Beech, Terrance E. Conners, et al.. (1989). IRIS: an object-oriented database management system. 5. 216–226.244 indexed citations
11.
Kent, William. (1989). An Overview of the Versioning Problem.. International Conference on Management of Data. 5–7.3 indexed citations
12.
Derrett, Nigel, et al.. (1986). An Object-Oriented Approach to Data Management.. 330–335.11 indexed citations
13.
Derrett, Nigel, William Kent, & Peter Lyngbæk. (1985). Some Aspects of Operations in an Object-Oriented Database.. IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin. 8. 66–74.15 indexed citations
14.
Kent, William. (1985). The Realities of Data: Basic Properties of Data Reconsidered.. 175–188.3 indexed citations
15.
Kent, William. (1984). A Realistic Look at Data.. IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin. 7(7). 22–27.3 indexed citations
16.
Kent, William. (1982). Choices in Practical Data Design. Very Large Data Bases. 165–180.14 indexed citations
Kent, William. (1980). Splitting the conceptual schema. Very Large Data Bases. 10–14.8 indexed citations
20.
Kent, William. (1976). New criteria for the conceptual model. Very Large Data Bases. 1–12.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.