William Keen

936 total citations
7 papers, 147 citations indexed

About

William Keen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, William Keen has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 147 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in William Keen's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers). William Keen is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers). William Keen collaborates with scholars based in United States. William Keen's co-authors include Barbara B. Gosink, Ji Yeon Chung, M K O'Boyle, Leland S. Rickman, Vachaspathi Palakodeti, Daniel G. Blanchard, Andrew Zalewski, David L. Fischman, Michael P. Savage and Paul Walinsky and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The American Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

William Keen

7 papers receiving 133 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Keen United States	5	102	61	49	47	46	7	147
Selwyn Wong New Zealand	10	207 2.0×	74 1.2×	27 0.6×	53 1.1×	56 1.2×	18	256
Alexandros Papachristidis United Kingdom	9	114 1.1×	55 0.9×	42 0.9×	53 1.1×	63 1.4×	42	196
Anfani Mirode France	5	117 1.1×	42 0.7×	40 0.8×	44 0.9×	89 1.9×	15	177
Abdul Moiz Hafiz United States	9	124 1.2×	27 0.4×	35 0.7×	64 1.4×	54 1.2×	33	183
Pruthvi C. Revaiah India	9	102 1.0×	72 1.2×	39 0.8×	116 2.5×	38 0.8×	60	204
Akash R. Patel United States	10	264 2.6×	49 0.8×	38 0.8×	48 1.0×	76 1.7×	32	345
Eric Gnall United States	8	104 1.0×	18 0.3×	46 0.9×	43 0.9×	31 0.7×	39	181
Othmar Pachinger Austria	7	255 2.5×	92 1.5×	46 0.9×	188 4.0×	108 2.3×	9	331
Jeremy Steele United States	6	143 1.4×	32 0.5×	24 0.5×	72 1.5×	47 1.0×	20	198
Kazuo Misumi Japan	6	129 1.3×	66 1.1×	28 0.6×	109 2.3×	27 0.6×	14	185

Countries citing papers authored by William Keen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Keen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Keen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Keen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Keen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Keen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Keen. The network helps show where William Keen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Keen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Keen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Keen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Keen. William Keen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Han, Paul K. J., et al.. (2018). Evidence Basis for a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Examination to Refine Referral for Outpatient Echocardiography. The American Journal of Medicine. 132(2). 227–233. 10 indexed citations

2.

Keen, William, et al.. (2017). Abstract 18153: Screening for Atrial Fibrillation is Feasible in US Managed Care Outpatient Facilities. Circulation. 2 indexed citations

3.

Palakodeti, Vachaspathi, William Keen, Leland S. Rickman, & Daniel G. Blanchard. (1997). Eustachian valve endocarditis: Detection with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Clinical Cardiology. 20(6). 579–580. 26 indexed citations

4.

O'Boyle, M K, et al.. (1996). Duplex sonography of the carotid arteries in patients with isolated aortic stenosis: imaging findings and relation to severity of stenosis.. American Journal of Roentgenology. 166(1). 197–202. 51 indexed citations

5.

Mahmud, Ehtisham, Bruno Cotter, Bruce J. Kimura, et al.. (1995). 703-4 Second Harmonic Imaging Enhances Contrast Echocardiography in Patients with Cardiac Disease: Demonstration of Feasibility. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 25(2). 39A–39A. 3 indexed citations

6.

Raichlen, Joel S., et al.. (1995). Adenosine radionuclide perfusion imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. The American Journal of Cardiology. 76(11). 817–821. 24 indexed citations

7.

Keen, William, et al.. (1994). Comparison of coronary angiographic findings during the first six hours of non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 74(4). 324–328. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact