William J. Maples

3.5k citations
50 papers · 2.6k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

    • Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas 7
    • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 7
    • CAR-T cell therapy research 5

William J. Maples

50 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

William J. Maples
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Oncology 1.5k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 418
  • Dermatology 204
  • Neurology 337
  • Epidemiology 660
Replace Luca Di Tommaso with:
Luca Di Tommaso Italy
Roberto Buzzoni Italy
Nicoletta Zilembo Italy
Barbara A. Centeno United States
Elaine M. Rankin United Kingdom
Ajay V. Maker United States
Sigurd Lax Austria
Antonio M. Ballesta Spain
Richard G. Hahn United States
Diana N. Ionescu Canada
William J. Maples relative to Luca Di Tommaso Italy Luca Di Tommaso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Luca Di Tommaso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Maples

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Maples's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Maples with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Maples more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Maples

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Maples. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Maples. The network helps show where William J. Maples may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William J. Maples, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William J. Maples Line = papers co-authored together William J. Maples links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Are we relying too heavily on HCAHPS
20161
2 201514
3 20145
4 201335
5 201246
6 2012131
7 2012125
8 201115
9 201170
10 2010207
11 2010330
12 2010124
13 200922
14 2007109
15 200762
16 2005103
17 200414
18 19983
19 19941
20 199226

About William J. Maples

William J. Maples is a scholar working on Oncology, Research and Theory, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (8 papers), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (7 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (7 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (5 papers) and Renal and related cancers (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.5k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (418 citations), Dermatology (204 citations), Neurology (337 citations) and Epidemiology (660 citations). William J. Maples has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belarus and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Charles Erlichman, Svetomir N. Markovic, Edward T. Creagan, Vera J. Suman, Barbara A. Pockaj, Tom R. Fitch, Lori A. Erickson, Ravi D. Rao, Robert R. McWilliams and Aditya Bardia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Pancreas and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026