William Howerton
Impact in
- Oral Surgery top 0.5%
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
- Orthodontics top 5%
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Papers in
-
- Dental Research and COVID-19 2
-
- Library Science and Administration 1
- Co-authors
- J B LudlowSL BrooksMaría MoraJohn B. LudlowDonald A. TyndallEnrique PlatínRoberta K. Weber
- Journals
- The Journal of the American Dental Association (2 papers)Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (1 paper)Journal of Dental Education (1 paper)Publications (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Howerton
6 papers receiving 845 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Oral Surgery 774
- Orthodontics 188
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 63
- General Dentistry 44
- Otorhinolaryngology 96
Countries citing papers authored by William Howerton
This map shows the geographic impact of William Howerton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Howerton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Howerton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Howerton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Howerton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Howerton. The network helps show where William Howerton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside William Howerton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 133 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 4 | Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 655 |
| 5 | Interactive computer-assisted instruction vs. lecture format in dental education. | 2004 | 31 |
| 6 | 2002 | 23 |
About William Howerton
William Howerton is a scholar working on General Dentistry, Library and Information Sciences, Oral Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 6 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental Radiography and Imaging (3 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (2 papers), Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), Web and Library Services (1 paper) and Library Science and Administration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (774 citations), Orthodontics (188 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (63 citations), General Dentistry (44 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (96 citations). William Howerton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J B Ludlow, SL Brooks, María Mora, John B. Ludlow, Donald A. Tyndall, Enrique Platín and Roberta K. Weber. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the American Dental Association, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Journal of Dental Education, Publications and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.