William Herschel

1.9k total citations
7 papers, 18 citations indexed

About

William Herschel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and History. According to data from OpenAlex, William Herschel has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 18 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 2 papers in History. Recurrent topics in William Herschel's work include History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (2 papers). William Herschel is often cited by papers focused on History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (2 papers). William Herschel collaborates with scholars based in . William Herschel's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Astronomy & Geophysics, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

William Herschel

2 papers receiving 12 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Herschel	2	7	6	4	3	3	7	18
K. M. Stringer Argentina	2	3 0.4×	4 0.7×	4 1.0×	2 0.7×	5 1.7×	3	14
George Fazekas United Kingdom	2	5 0.7×			3 1.0×		2	6
A. Hasib Cyprus	2	4 0.6×			2 0.7×		3	4
Connie Brand Brazil	1	5 0.7×			3 1.0×		2	5
K. K. Kwan United States	2	4 0.6×			2 0.7×		2	7
Nicole Nichols United States	2	3 0.4×			3 1.0×		3	7
Valentin Gabeur France	2	5 0.7×			4 1.3×		2	9
David Carrel United States	3		5 0.8×		3 1.0×		5	14
Thibault Laugel France	3	2 0.3×	1 0.2×	2 0.5×	8 2.7×		4	10
Alan DenAdel United States	2		6 1.0×		3 1.0×		3	20

Countries citing papers authored by William Herschel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Herschel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Herschel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Herschel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Herschel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Herschel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Herschel. The network helps show where William Herschel may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Herschel, William, et al.. (2015). Dactylography and The Origin of Finger-Printing. Cambridge University Press eBooks.

2.

Herschel, William. (2014). Catalogue of 500 New Nebulae, Nebulous Stars, Planetary Nebulae, and Clusters of Stars; With Remarks on the Construction of the Heavens. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

3.

Herschel, William. (2013). The Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel. Cambridge University Press eBooks.

4.

Herschel, William. (2012). ‘The Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel’ at 100. Astronomy & Geophysics. 53(2). 2.13–2.13.

5.

Herschel, William, et al.. (2010). Capella Observatory CCD Double Star Measurements - Report 1. 6(2). 116–132.

6.

Herschel, William, et al.. (2010). The Origin of Finger-Printing. 16 indexed citations

7.

Herschel, William. (1982). Account of a Comet. International Astronomical Union Colloquium. 60. 9–19. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact