William H. Craig

942 citations
25 papers · 719 indexed · h-index 12

William H. Craig

25 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

William H. Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Hematology 240
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 226
  • Genetics 107
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 89
  • Immunology 191
Replace Jilu Zhang with:
Jilu Zhang China
Dardo E. Ferrara United States
David W. Hammond United Kingdom
Masaaki Tsuji Japan
Peter W. Chen United States
Kôichi Yasuda Japan
Thomas Chow United States
Juan A. Quintana Chile
Koshi Matsui Japan
Ichiro Ito Japan
William H. Craig relative to Jilu Zhang China Jilu Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Jilu Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Craig. The network helps show where William H. Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside William H. Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William H. Craig Line = papers co-authored together William H. Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20152
2
The seven ages of centrifuge modelling
20033
3 200114
4 200013
5 19987
6 199519
7 199456
8 19943
9 1993388
10 19922
11 199035
12 199082
13 199014
14 198912
15
MODELLING PILE INSTALLATION IN CENTRIFUGE EXPERIMENTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, SAN FRANCISCO, 12-16 AUGUST 1985
19851
16
INSTALLATION STUDIES FOR MODEL PILES
198512
17 19837
18 19813
19
Survey at boat ramps from Tully to Port Douglas
19801
20 19781

About William H. Craig

William H. Craig is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Civil and Structural Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 25 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (9 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (8 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (5 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (3 papers), Geotechnical and construction materials studies (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (2 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (240 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (226 citations) and Genetics (107 citations). William H. Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Lansdorp, R Kay, Robert L. Cutler, Wieslawa H. Dragowska, Marie-Térèse Little, Sibrand Poppema, Kazuo Tani, Raymond Kuhn, Dean S. Cunningham and T. H. Courtney. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Journal of Materials Science and Géotechnique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026