William Grosso

819 total citations
10 papers, 313 citations indexed

About

William Grosso is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, William Grosso has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 313 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 3 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in William Grosso's work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (4 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers). William Grosso is often cited by papers focused on Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (4 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers). William Grosso collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. William Grosso's co-authors include Mark A. Musen, Samson W. Tu, Ray W. Fergerson, John H. Gennari, Henrik Eriksson, Natasha Noy, Martin J. O’Connor, Stefan Decker, Enric Plaza and Bob Wielinga and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Ecological Entomology and Knowledge and Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

William Grosso

9 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Grosso United States	8	197	132	117	55	27	10	313
Jens H. Jahnke Canada	11	251 1.3×	372 2.8×	167 1.4×	13 0.2×	29 1.1×	40	529
Sebastian Herold Germany	11	187 0.9×	212 1.6×	115 1.0×	20 0.4×	12 0.4×	50	319
Thi Hong Tran Japan	9	125 0.6×	151 1.1×	130 1.1×	19 0.3×	35 1.3×	52	340
Ke Zhai China	12	215 1.1×	109 0.8×	110 0.9×	10 0.2×	24 0.9×	26	414
Steven A. Demurjian United States	12	241 1.2×	217 1.6×	171 1.5×	8 0.1×	44 1.6×	73	431
Lianchen Liu China	8	82 0.4×	89 0.7×	107 0.9×	12 0.2×	4 0.1×	40	332
Norbert Luttenberger Germany	11	114 0.6×	144 1.1×	176 1.5×	6 0.1×	23 0.9×	26	286
Kevlin Henney Germany	8	172 0.9×	208 1.6×	110 0.9×	6 0.1×	11 0.4×	20	325
Ioana Baldini United States	9	83 0.4×	149 1.1×	145 1.2×	9 0.2×	5 0.2×	20	323

Countries citing papers authored by William Grosso

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Grosso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Grosso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Grosso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Grosso

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Grosso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Grosso. The network helps show where William Grosso may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Grosso

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Grosso. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Grosso based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Grosso. William Grosso is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Musen, Mark A., et al.. (2007). Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Systems. 10 indexed citations

2.

Gennari, John H., William Grosso, & Mark A. Musen. (2007). A Method-Description Language: An initial ontology with examples.

3.

Gennari, John H., Mark A. Musen, Ray W. Fergerson, et al.. (2003). The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 58(1). 89–123. 5 indexed citations

4.

Fensel, Dieter, Enrico Motta, Frank van Harmelen, et al.. (2003). The Unified Problem-Solving Method Development Language UPML. Knowledge and Information Systems. 5(1). 83–131. 31 indexed citations

5.

Grosso, William, et al.. (2001). Java RMI. 66 indexed citations

6.

O’Connor, Martin J., William Grosso, Samson W. Tu, & Mark A. Musen. (2001). RASTA: a distributed temporal abstraction system to facilitate knowledge-driven monitoring of clinical databases.. PubMed. 84(Pt 1). 508–12. 24 indexed citations

7.

Noy, Natasha, William Grosso, & Mark A. Musen. (2000). Knowledge-Acquisition Interfaces for Domain Experts: An Empirical Evaluation of Protégé-2000. 16 indexed citations

8.

Fensel, Dieter, Enrico Motta, V. Richard Benjamins, et al.. (1999). The Unified Problem-Solving Method Development Language. Ecological Entomology. 7 indexed citations

9.

Grosso, William, Henrik Eriksson, Ray W. Fergerson, et al.. (1999). Knowledge modeling at the millennium : The design and evolution of Protégé-2000. 141 indexed citations

10.

Fensel, Dieter, V. Richard Benjamins, Stefan Decker, et al.. (1999). The Component Model of UPML in a Nutshell. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact