Countries citing papers authored by John H. Gennari
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Gennari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Gennari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Gennari more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Gennari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Gennari. The network helps show where John H. Gennari may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Gennari
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Gennari.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Gennari based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Gennari. John H. Gennari is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gennari, John H., Matthias König, Göksel Mısırlı, et al.. (2021). OMEX metadata specification (version 1.2). Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics. 18(3).5 indexed citations
Neal, Maxwell L., John H. Gennari, Dagmar Waltemath, David Nickerson, & Matthias König. (2020). Open modeling and exchange (OMEX) metadata specification version 1.0. Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics. 17(2-3).4 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Lucy Lu & John H. Gennari. (2017). Similarity Metrics for Determining Overlap Among Biological Pathways..2 indexed citations
Neal, Maxwell L., Daniel L. Cook, & John H. Gennari. (2013). An OWL knowledge base for classifying and querying collections of physiological models: A prototype human physiome.. 16–21.4 indexed citations
Cook, Daniel L., José L. V. Mejino, Maxwell L. Neal, & John H. Gennari. (2008). Bridging biological ontologies and biosimulation: the ontology of physics for biology.. PubMed. 136–40.20 indexed citations
10.
Gennari, John H., William Grosso, & Mark A. Musen. (2007). A Method-Description Language: An initial ontology with examples.
Pattison-Gordon, Edward, James J. Cimino, George Hripcsak, et al.. (1996). Requirements of a Sharable Guideline Representation for Computer Applications.10 indexed citations
16.
Gennari, John H., et al.. (1996). Reuse For Knowledge-Based Systems and CORBA Components.11 indexed citations
17.
Eriksson, Henrik, et al.. (1995). Custom-Tailored Development Tools for Knowledge-Based Systems.7 indexed citations
18.
Gennari, John H., et al.. (1995). Intermed: An Internet-based Medical Collaboratory. Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. 1023–1023.10 indexed citations
19.
Puerta, Ángel R., Henrik Eriksson, John H. Gennari, & Mark A. Musen. (1994). Model-based automated generation of user interfaces. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 471–477.26 indexed citations
20.
Gennari, John H. & Pat Langley. (1990). An experimental study of concept formation. eScholarship (California Digital Library).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.