William Griffiths-Jones

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 779 citations indexed

About

William Griffiths-Jones is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, William Griffiths-Jones has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 779 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in William Griffiths-Jones's work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (10 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (9 papers). William Griffiths-Jones is often cited by papers focused on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (10 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (9 papers). William Griffiths-Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. William Griffiths-Jones's co-authors include Darren B. Chen, Samuel J. MacDessi, Ian A. Harris, Johan Bellemans, Jil A. Wood, Sam Griffiths‐Jones, Ashish D. Diwan, Oliver M. Stokes, Conor Jones and Andrew Clarke and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Arthroplasty, European Spine Journal and Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy.

In The Last Decade

William Griffiths-Jones

14 papers receiving 756 citations

Hit Papers

Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Griffiths-Jones United Kingdom 9 763 63 51 23 13 16 779
Jinjun Zhu United States 7 659 0.9× 30 0.5× 28 0.5× 16 0.7× 14 1.1× 8 691
Primitivo Gómez-Cardero Spain 10 258 0.3× 35 0.6× 35 0.7× 12 0.5× 20 1.5× 26 328
Bandar Hetaimish Saudi Arabia 9 507 0.7× 44 0.7× 43 0.8× 6 0.3× 7 0.5× 21 525
Cass K. Nakasone United States 12 353 0.5× 25 0.4× 20 0.4× 10 0.4× 25 1.9× 57 366
Jenni Tahmassebi United Kingdom 14 1.1k 1.5× 14 0.2× 43 0.8× 21 0.9× 8 0.6× 27 1.1k
Pak-Lin Chin Singapore 9 388 0.5× 25 0.4× 16 0.3× 5 0.2× 5 0.4× 12 405
Tharun Karthikeyan United States 8 392 0.5× 24 0.4× 14 0.3× 5 0.2× 7 0.5× 11 403
Ji-Hyeon Yim South Korea 8 734 1.0× 95 1.5× 69 1.4× 20 0.9× 17 1.3× 11 745
Nicholas Bottomley United Kingdom 12 489 0.6× 83 1.3× 36 0.7× 3 0.1× 10 0.8× 26 515
Anita H. Chen United States 8 221 0.3× 185 2.9× 16 0.3× 11 0.5× 9 0.7× 23 275

Countries citing papers authored by William Griffiths-Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Griffiths-Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Griffiths-Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Griffiths-Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Griffiths-Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Griffiths-Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Griffiths-Jones. The network helps show where William Griffiths-Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Griffiths-Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Griffiths-Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Griffiths-Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Griffiths-Jones. William Griffiths-Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
MacDessi, Samuel J., Victor A. van de Graaf, Jil A. Wood, et al.. (2024). Not all knees are the same. The Bone & Joint Journal. 106-B(6). 525–531. 2 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Darren B., Jil A. Wood, William Griffiths-Jones, et al.. (2024). Considerations of morphometry and phenotypes in modern knee arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 106-B(12). 1363–1368.
3.
MacDessi, Samuel J., R. Allom, William Griffiths-Jones, et al.. (2022). The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 30(9). 2931–2940. 25 indexed citations
5.
MacDessi, Samuel J., William Griffiths-Jones, Ian A. Harris, Johan Bellemans, & Darren B. Chen. (2021). Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification. The Bone & Joint Journal. 103-B(2). 329–337. 370 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Brunton, L., et al.. (2021). Revolutionising rapid recovery: a quality improvement project in hip and knee replacement. BMJ Open Quality. 10(2). e001249–e001249. 3 indexed citations
7.
Griffiths-Jones, William, Darren B. Chen, Ian A. Harris, Johan Bellemans, & Samuel J. MacDessi. (2021). Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA): An algorithm for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in the arthritic patient population. Bone & Joint Open. 2(5). 351–358. 58 indexed citations
8.
MacDessi, Samuel J., William Griffiths-Jones, Ian A. Harris, Johan Bellemans, & Darren B. Chen. (2020). The arithmetic HKA (aHKA) predicts the constitutional alignment of the arthritic knee compared to the normal contralateral knee. Bone & Joint Open. 1(7). 339–345. 87 indexed citations
9.
Thompson, K. L., William Griffiths-Jones, Jil A. Wood, et al.. (2020). Interobserver agreement of sensor-derived compartmental pressure measurements in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. The Knee. 27(3). 717–722. 9 indexed citations
10.
MacDessi, Samuel J., William Griffiths-Jones, Ian A. Harris, Johan Bellemans, & Darren B. Chen. (2020). The arithmetic HKA (aHKA) predicts the constitutional alignment of the arthritic knee compared to the normal contralateral knee. Bone & Joint Open. 1(7). 339–345. 4 indexed citations
11.
MacDessi, Samuel J., William Griffiths-Jones, Darren B. Chen, et al.. (2019). Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. The Bone & Joint Journal. 102-B(1). 117–124. 139 indexed citations
12.
Griffiths-Jones, William, Conor Jones, Dino Samartzis, et al.. (2017). The current state of the evidence for the use of drains in spinal surgery: systematic review. European Spine Journal. 26(11). 2729–2738. 34 indexed citations
13.
Griffiths-Jones, William, et al.. (2015). Complications of the Anterior Approach to the Lumbar Spine. Global Spine Journal. 5(1_suppl). s–35.
14.
Jones, Conor, et al.. (2015). Presentation of cauda equina syndrome during labour. BMJ Case Reports. 2015. bcr2015212119–bcr2015212119. 5 indexed citations
15.
Griffiths-Jones, William, M.R. Norton, E.D. Fern, & D.H. Williams. (2014). The Equivalence of Remote Electronic and Paper Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 29(11). 2136–2139. 14 indexed citations
16.
Griffiths-Jones, William, E.D. Fern, M.R. Norton, & D.H. Williams. (2012). PSU24 The Equivalence of Remote Electronic and Paper Collection of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROS): A Crossover Trial. Value in Health. 15(7). A406–A406. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026