William Gilmer

791 total citations
9 papers, 553 citations indexed

About

William Gilmer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Gilmer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 553 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 5 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in William Gilmer's work include Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). William Gilmer is often cited by papers focused on Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). William Gilmer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and Australia. William Gilmer's co-authors include Sarah H. Lisanby, Andrew D. Krystal, Lauren B. Marangell, Mustafa M. Husain, Peter B. Rosenquist, Mark S. George, Scott T. Aaronson, Daniel F. Maixner, Zafiris J. Daskalakis and Elliott Richelson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Neuropsychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

William Gilmer

9 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Gilmer United States 8 326 289 163 157 93 9 553
Mario A. Cristancho United States 12 297 0.9× 209 0.7× 101 0.6× 161 1.0× 65 0.7× 28 600
René Benadhira France 9 437 1.3× 238 0.8× 96 0.6× 202 1.3× 143 1.5× 20 607
Demétrio Ortega Rumi Brazil 8 477 1.5× 230 0.8× 101 0.6× 215 1.4× 116 1.2× 14 626
Andrew Mogg United Kingdom 9 460 1.4× 268 0.9× 144 0.9× 229 1.5× 78 0.8× 12 730
Shinsuke Kito Japan 12 337 1.0× 158 0.5× 72 0.4× 292 1.9× 59 0.6× 45 530
Bernardo Sampaio-Júnior Brazil 12 580 1.8× 281 1.0× 67 0.4× 316 2.0× 67 0.7× 14 767
Santiago Tovar-Perdomo Canada 6 474 1.5× 190 0.7× 66 0.4× 285 1.8× 107 1.2× 6 576
Ghassen Saba France 11 501 1.5× 253 0.9× 82 0.5× 214 1.4× 160 1.7× 22 696
Marina O. Rosa Brazil 8 382 1.2× 208 0.7× 107 0.7× 160 1.0× 83 0.9× 19 517
Karl Lanocha United States 4 324 1.0× 159 0.6× 63 0.4× 168 1.1× 96 1.0× 6 396

Countries citing papers authored by William Gilmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Gilmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Gilmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Gilmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Gilmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Gilmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Gilmer. The network helps show where William Gilmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Gilmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Gilmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Gilmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Gilmer. William Gilmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Solvason, H. Brent, Mustafa M. Husain, Paul B. Fitzgerald, et al.. (2013). Improvement in Quality of Life With Left Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Pharmacoresistant Major Depression: Acute and Six Month Outcomes. Brain stimulation. 7(2). 219–225. 25 indexed citations
2.
Patkar, Ashwin A., William Gilmer, Chi‐Un Pae, et al.. (2012). A 6 Week Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ziprasidone for the Acute Depressive Mixed State. PLoS ONE. 7(4). e34757–e34757. 48 indexed citations
3.
Pae, Chi‐Un, Ashwin A. Patkar, William Gilmer, et al.. (2012). Predictors of Response to Ziprasidone: Results from a 6-Week Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial for Acute Depressive Mixed State. Pharmacopsychiatry. 45(4). 152–155. 7 indexed citations
4.
Pae, Chi‐Un, Paul A. Vöhringer, Niki S. Holtzman, et al.. (2011). Mixed depression: A study of its phenomenology and relation to treatment response. Journal of Affective Disorders. 136(3). 1059–1061. 21 indexed citations
5.
Akiskal, Hagop S., et al.. (2010). Is unrecognized bipolar disorder a frequent contributor to apparent treatment resistant depression?. Journal of Affective Disorders. 127(1-3). 10–18. 67 indexed citations
7.
Friedman, Edward S., Stephen R. Wisniewski, William Gilmer, et al.. (2009). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics associated with worsened depression during treatment with citalopram: results of the NIMH STAR*D trial. Depression and Anxiety. 26(7). 612–621. 24 indexed citations
8.
Lisanby, Sarah H., Mustafa M. Husain, Peter B. Rosenquist, et al.. (2008). Daily Left Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Acute Treatment of Major Depression: Clinical Predictors of Outcome in a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 34(2). 522–534. 237 indexed citations
9.
Rolak, Loren A., William Gilmer, & Warren J. Strittmatter. (1990). Low yield in the diagnostic evaluation of transient ischemic attacks. Neurology. 40(5). 747–747. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026