William G. Newton

1.8k total citations
32 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

William G. Newton is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, William G. Newton has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 11 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in William G. Newton's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (29 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (19 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (16 papers). William G. Newton is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (29 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (19 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (16 papers). William G. Newton collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. William G. Newton's co-authors include Bao-An Li, F. J. Fattoyev, J. R. Stone, J. Hooker, Andrew W. Steiner, Stefano Gandolfi, Bao-Jun Cai, Jun Xu, David Tsang and De-Hua Wen and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

William G. Newton

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William G. Newton United States 19 846 561 336 173 147 32 1.1k
C. Ducoin France 13 605 0.7× 465 0.8× 306 0.9× 84 0.5× 173 1.2× 25 832
Debades Bandyopadhyay India 17 1.0k 1.2× 587 1.0× 455 1.4× 119 0.7× 350 2.4× 68 1.3k
A. F. Fantina France 19 934 1.1× 427 0.8× 485 1.4× 142 0.8× 171 1.2× 50 1.1k
O. Lourenço Brazil 21 1.0k 1.2× 1.2k 2.1× 281 0.8× 166 1.0× 256 1.7× 63 1.7k
Bao-Jun Cai United States 13 480 0.6× 515 0.9× 222 0.7× 71 0.4× 149 1.0× 29 794
A. Akmal United States 2 1.5k 1.8× 901 1.6× 623 1.9× 210 1.2× 365 2.5× 3 1.9k
M. Dutra Brazil 19 973 1.2× 922 1.6× 274 0.8× 171 1.0× 227 1.5× 57 1.4k
Márcio Ferreira Portugal 18 539 0.6× 540 1.0× 104 0.3× 92 0.5× 173 1.2× 38 868
Jinniu Hu China 16 516 0.6× 483 0.9× 190 0.6× 80 0.5× 158 1.1× 64 778
E. N. E. van Dalen Germany 12 459 0.5× 726 1.3× 233 0.7× 39 0.2× 196 1.3× 20 896

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Newton. The network helps show where William G. Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Newton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Newton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Newton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Newton. William G. Newton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tsang, David, et al.. (2025). Resonant shattering flares as asteroseismic tests of chiral effective field theory. Physical review. C. 111(1).
2.
Tsang, David, et al.. (2024). Strengthening nuclear symmetry energy constraints using multiple resonant shattering flares of neutron stars with realistic mass uncertainties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 532(1). 827–840. 4 indexed citations
3.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2023). Constraining the Nuclear Symmetry Energy with Multimessenger Resonant Shattering Flares. Physical Review Letters. 130(11). 112701–112701. 20 indexed citations
4.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2022). Ensembles of unified crust and core equations of state in a nuclear-multimessenger astrophysics environment. The European Physical Journal A. 58(4). 7 indexed citations
5.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2021). Nuclear symmetry energy from neutron skins and pure neutron matter in a Bayesian framework. Physical review. C. 103(6). 25 indexed citations
6.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2021). Resonant shattering flares as multimessenger probes of the nuclear symmetry energy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 504(1). 1129–1143. 21 indexed citations
7.
Zhang, Naibo, Bao-Jun Cai, Bao-An Li, William G. Newton, & Jun Xu. (2017). How tightly is the nuclear symmetry energy constrained by a unitary Fermi gas?. Nuclear Science and Techniques. 28(12). 42 indexed citations
8.
Cai, Bao-Jun, F. J. Fattoyev, Bao-An Li, & William G. Newton. (2015). Critical density and impact ofΔ(1232)resonance formation in neutron stars. Physical Review C. 92(1). 70 indexed citations
9.
Steiner, Andrew W., Stefano Gandolfi, F. J. Fattoyev, & William G. Newton. (2015). Using neutron star observations to determine crust thicknesses, moments of inertia, and tidal deformabilities. Physical Review C. 91(1). 105 indexed citations
10.
Newton, William G., Sabrina Berger, & B. Haskell. (2015). Observational constraints on neutron star crust–core coupling during glitches. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 454(4). 4400–4410. 24 indexed citations
11.
He, Xiao-Tao, F. J. Fattoyev, Bao-An Li, & William G. Newton. (2015). Impact of the equation-of-state–gravity degeneracy on constraining the nuclear symmetry energy from astrophysical observables. Physical Review C. 91(1). 26 indexed citations
12.
13.
Hooker, J., William G. Newton, & Bao-An Li. (2015). Efficacy of crustal superfluid neutrons in pulsar glitch models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 449(4). 3559–3567. 17 indexed citations
14.
Pais, Helena, William G. Newton, & J. R. Stone. (2014). Phase transitions in core-collapse supernova matter at sub-saturation densities. Physical Review C. 90(6). 17 indexed citations
15.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2014). Constraints on the symmetry energy from observational probes of the neutron star crust. The European Physical Journal A. 50(2). 35 indexed citations
16.
Li, Bao-An, Lie-Wen Chen, F. J. Fattoyev, William G. Newton, & Chang Xu. (2013). Probing Nuclear Symmetry Energy and its Imprints on Properties of Nuclei, Nuclear Reactions, Neutron Stars and Gravitational Waves. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 413. 12021–12021. 13 indexed citations
17.
Hooker, J., William G. Newton, & Bao-An Li. (2013). Applying the "snowplow" model for pulsar glitches to constrain nuclear symmetry energy. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 420. 12153–12153. 2 indexed citations
18.
Newton, William G.. (2013). A taste of pasta?. Nature Physics. 9(7). 396–397. 12 indexed citations
19.
Wen, De-Hua, William G. Newton, & Bao-An Li. (2012). Sensitivity of the neutron starr-mode instability window to the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy. Physical Review C. 85(2). 34 indexed citations
20.
Stevenson, P. D., M. R. Strayer, J. R. Stone, & William G. Newton. (2004). GIANT RESONANCES FROM TDHF. International Journal of Modern Physics E. 13(1). 181–185. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026