J. Hooker

461 total citations
19 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

J. Hooker is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Hooker has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 8 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in J. Hooker's work include Nuclear physics research studies (13 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers). J. Hooker is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (13 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers). J. Hooker collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. J. Hooker's co-authors include William G. Newton, Bao-An Li, G. V. Rogachev, H. Jayatissa, S. Upadhyayula, E. Koshchiy, A. Saastamoinen, B. T. Roeder, De-Hua Wen and V. Z. Goldberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

J. Hooker

19 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Hooker United States 10 168 136 71 62 60 19 282
T. R. Routray India 14 303 1.8× 216 1.6× 58 0.8× 47 0.8× 13 0.2× 32 344
K. S. Kim South Korea 11 305 1.8× 95 0.7× 63 0.9× 25 0.4× 22 0.4× 53 343
C. Mondal India 12 218 1.3× 276 2.0× 57 0.8× 83 1.3× 12 0.2× 21 373
M. Damashek United States 6 161 1.0× 86 0.6× 61 0.9× 31 0.5× 35 0.6× 14 274
S. K. Pal India 10 287 1.7× 94 0.7× 136 1.9× 39 0.6× 36 0.6× 20 339
M. Youngs United States 8 268 1.6× 56 0.4× 78 1.1× 33 0.5× 50 0.8× 27 300
R. Michaels United States 2 243 1.4× 62 0.5× 61 0.9× 38 0.6× 60 1.0× 3 258
P. Russotto Italy 9 297 1.8× 86 0.6× 61 0.9× 26 0.4× 81 1.4× 34 369
V. Lozza Germany 7 208 1.2× 93 0.7× 115 1.6× 14 0.2× 32 0.5× 14 284
R. T. Edwards United States 14 381 2.3× 113 0.8× 52 0.7× 16 0.3× 24 0.4× 26 482

Countries citing papers authored by J. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Hooker. The network helps show where J. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Hooker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Hooker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Hooker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Hooker. J. Hooker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Ahn, S., et al.. (2023). Restoring original signals from pile-up using deep learning. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1055. 168492–168492. 6 indexed citations
2.
Ahn, Sangtae, et al.. (2023). Noise signal identification in time projection chamber data using deep learning model. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1048. 168025–168025. 7 indexed citations
3.
Barbui, M., Alexander Volya, S. Ahn, et al.. (2022). α-cluster structure of Ne18. Physical review. C. 106(5). 5 indexed citations
4.
Chipps, K. A., J. T. Harke, Natalie Cooper, et al.. (2022). Developing the S32(p,d)S*31(p)(γ) reaction to probe the P30(p,γ)S31 reaction rate in classical novae. Physical review. C. 105(4). 1 indexed citations
5.
Mazzocchi, C., W. Dominik, A. Fijałkowska, et al.. (2022). β-delayed charged-particle decay of Si22,23. Physical review. C. 106(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Linares, R., E. N. Cardozo, V. Guimarães, et al.. (2021). Elastic scattering measurements for the C10+Pb208 system at Elab=66 MeV. Physical review. C. 103(4). 11 indexed citations
7.
Bishop, J., G. V. Rogachev, Sangjoon Ahn, et al.. (2021). Evidence against the Efimov effect in C12 from spectroscopy and astrophysics. Physical review. C. 103(5). 9 indexed citations
8.
Upadhyayula, S., G. V. Rogachev, J. Bishop, et al.. (2020). Search for the high-spin members of the α:2n:α band in Be10. Physical review. C. 101(3). 4 indexed citations
9.
Koshchiy, E., G. V. Rogachev, E. C. Pollacco, et al.. (2020). Texas Active Target (TexAT) detector for experiments with rare isotope beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 957. 163398–163398. 25 indexed citations
10.
Ota, S., G. Christian, G. Lotay, et al.. (2020). Decay properties of 22Ne + α resonances and their impact on s-process nucleosynthesis. Physics Letters B. 802. 135256–135256. 17 indexed citations
11.
Jayatissa, H., G. V. Rogachev, V. Z. Goldberg, et al.. (2020). Constraining the 22Ne(α,γ)26Mg and 22Ne(α,n)25Mg reaction rates using sub-Coulomb α-transfer reactions. Physics Letters B. 802. 135267–135267. 19 indexed citations
12.
Hooker, J., G. V. Rogachev, E. Koshchiy, et al.. (2019). Structure of C9 through proton resonance scattering with the Texas Active Target detector. Physical review. C. 100(5). 10 indexed citations
13.
Hooker, J., G. V. Rogachev, V. Z. Goldberg, et al.. (2017). Structure of 10N in 9C+p resonance scattering. Physics Letters B. 769. 62–66. 14 indexed citations
14.
Uberseder, E., G. V. Rogachev, V. Z. Goldberg, et al.. (2016). Nuclear structure beyond the neutron drip line: The lowest energy states in 9 He via their T = 5/2 isobaric analogs in 9 Li. Physics Letters B. 754. 323–327. 9 indexed citations
15.
Hooker, J., William G. Newton, & Bao-An Li. (2015). Efficacy of crustal superfluid neutrons in pulsar glitch models. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 449(4). 3559–3567. 17 indexed citations
16.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2014). Constraints on the symmetry energy from observational probes of the neutron star crust. The European Physical Journal A. 50(2). 35 indexed citations
17.
Hooker, J., William G. Newton, & Bao-An Li. (2013). Applying the "snowplow" model for pulsar glitches to constrain nuclear symmetry energy. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 420. 12153–12153. 2 indexed citations
18.
Li, Bao-An, Lie-Wen Chen, J. Hooker, et al.. (2011). Imprints of Nuclear Symmetry Energy on Properties of Neutron Stars. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 312(4). 42006–42006. 9 indexed citations
19.
Newton, William G., et al.. (2011). Upper limits on the observational effects of nuclear pasta in neutron stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 418(4). 2343–2349. 80 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. R. Routray Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. S. Kim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Mondal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Damashek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. K. Pal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Youngs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Michaels Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Russotto Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by V. Lozza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. T. Edwards
Rankless by CCL
2026