William Fulmor
Impact in
- Toxicology top 2%
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Papers in
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 3
-
- Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds 4
- Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 2
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Co-authors
- G. O. MORTONW.E. MeyerJohn LancasterGeorge E. Van LearR. W. BroschardDonna B. CosulichJames B. PatrickJohn S. Webb
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (11 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (3 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of the Chemical Society C Organic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Fulmor
18 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Toxicology 99
- Organic Chemistry 357
- Pharmaceutical Science 72
- Biotechnology 79
- Pharmacology 108
Countries citing papers authored by William Fulmor
This map shows the geographic impact of William Fulmor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Fulmor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Fulmor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Fulmor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Fulmor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Fulmor. The network helps show where William Fulmor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Fulmor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1973 | 23 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1969 | 96 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1968 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1966 | 27 | |
| 12 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1964 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 36 | |
| 15 | 1962 | 120 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 128 | |
| 17 | 1959 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1957 | 29 |
About William Fulmor
William Fulmor is a scholar working on Toxicology, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 18 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (4 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (4 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (99 citations), Organic Chemistry (357 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (72 citations), Biotechnology (79 citations) and Pharmacology (108 citations). William Fulmor has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include G. O. MORTON, W.E. Meyer, John Lancaster, George E. Van Lear, R. W. Broschard, Donna B. Cosulich, James B. Patrick, John S. Webb, John H. Mowat and Richard P. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of the Chemical Society C Organic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.