William Fish

919 total citations
16 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

William Fish is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, William Fish has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 6 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 6 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in William Fish's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Hallucinations in medical conditions (2 papers). William Fish is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Hallucinations in medical conditions (2 papers). William Fish collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. William Fish's co-authors include Eros Corazza and Cynthia Macdonald and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.

In The Last Decade

William Fish

14 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Fish New Zealand 7 281 173 173 91 30 16 392
Jeff Speaks United States 10 339 1.2× 125 0.7× 259 1.5× 116 1.3× 38 1.3× 32 448
Susanna Schellenberg United States 13 419 1.5× 269 1.6× 276 1.6× 161 1.8× 9 0.3× 33 535
Matthew Soteriou United Kingdom 9 276 1.0× 189 1.1× 207 1.2× 93 1.0× 7 0.2× 17 399
Max Deutsch Hong Kong 8 167 0.6× 214 1.2× 293 1.7× 60 0.7× 22 0.7× 19 374
Gregory Landini United States 8 170 0.6× 124 0.7× 117 0.7× 70 0.8× 5 0.2× 44 337
Susanna Siegel United States 12 435 1.5× 444 2.6× 332 1.9× 127 1.4× 21 0.7× 31 737
Torin Alter United States 9 312 1.1× 125 0.7× 220 1.3× 169 1.9× 4 0.1× 35 393
Elijah Chudnoff United States 14 304 1.1× 221 1.3× 365 2.1× 104 1.1× 9 0.3× 23 510
Andrew Brook Canada 8 116 0.4× 101 0.6× 124 0.7× 49 0.5× 7 0.2× 28 266
M. G. F. Martin United Kingdom 7 584 2.1× 419 2.4× 382 2.2× 214 2.4× 6 0.2× 14 780

Countries citing papers authored by William Fish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Fish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Fish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Fish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Fish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Fish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Fish. The network helps show where William Fish may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Fish

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Fish. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Fish based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Fish. William Fish is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Fish, William. (2022). Naïve realism and the phenomenology of perception and memory. Achta Scientiarum Human Social Science. 43(3). e61023–e61023. 2 indexed citations
2.
Fish, William. (2012). High-level properties and visual experience. Philosophical Studies. 162(1). 43–55. 31 indexed citations
3.
Fish, William. (2012). Perception, hallucination, and illusion: reply to my critics. Philosophical Studies. 163(1). 57–66. 9 indexed citations
4.
Fish, William & Cynthia Macdonald. (2011). McDowell’s Alternative Conceptions of the World. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 19(1). 87–94.
5.
Fish, William. (2010). Philosophy of Perception. 18 indexed citations
6.
Fish, William. (2010). Philosophy of Perception: A Contemporary Introduction. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 37 indexed citations
7.
Fish, William. (2009). Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Oxford University Press eBooks. 205 indexed citations
8.
Fish, William. (2008). Relationalism and the problems of consciousness. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 27(3). 167–180. 4 indexed citations
9.
Fish, William & Cynthia Macdonald. (2007). On McDowell's identity conception of truth. Analysis. 67(293). 36–41. 3 indexed citations
10.
Fish, William. (2005). DISJUNCTIVISM AND NON-DISJUNCTIVISM: MAKING SENSE OF THE DEBATE. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 105(1). 119–127. 3 indexed citations
11.
Fish, William. (2004). The Direct/Indirect Distinction in Contemporary Philosophy of Perception. Essays in Philosophy. 5(1). 1–11. 8 indexed citations
12.
Fish, William. (2004). Disjunctivism and Non-Disjunctivism: Making Sense of the Debate. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 105(1). 119–127. 2 indexed citations
13.
Corazza, Eros, et al.. (2002). Who Is I?. Philosophical Studies. 107(1). 1–21. 61 indexed citations
14.
Fish, William. (1981). The Intrinsic Connection Between Ethics and Psychotherapy. Counseling and Values. 25(4). 269–278. 3 indexed citations
15.
Fish, William, et al.. (1981). Suicide and children. Death Education. 5(3). 215–222. 5 indexed citations
16.
Fish, William, et al.. (1974). In memoriam. (Sir Victor Ewings Negus MS DSC FRCS FRCSE (HON) FRCSI (HON) (1887-1974).. PubMed. 19(6). 394–394. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026