William Feaster

34 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

William Feaster
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 58
  • Health Information Management 45
  • Emergency Medicine 93
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 13
  • Health Informatics 11
Replace Michael C. Spaeder with:
Michael C. Spaeder United States
Howard E. Jeffries United States
David Wensley Canada
Eric Tham United States
Joseph Frassica United States
C. Jane Wallace United States
Christopher M. Horvat United States
Sandeep Tripathi United States
Katie Lobner United States
Alexander Kaserer Switzerland
William Feaster relative to Michael C. Spaeder United States Michael C. Spaeder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Michael C. Spaeder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Feaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Feaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Feaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Feaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Feaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Feaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Feaster. The network helps show where William Feaster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Feaster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Feaster Line = papers co-authored together William Feaster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199374
2 202054
3 202153
4 201253
5 200933
6 202230
7 201827
8 201825
9 202019
10 202117
11 202215
12 202014
13 198614
14 202213
15 202012
16 202012
17 202111
18 202111
19 201710
20 20208

About William Feaster

William Feaster is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (10 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (5 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers) and COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (58 citations), Health Information Management (45 citations), Emergency Medicine (93 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (13 citations) and Health Informatics (11 citations). William Feaster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Louis Ehwerhemuepha, Anthony Chang, Sharief Taraman, Cyril Rakovski, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, Alex Macario, Bassam Kadry, Caroline Steele, Zeev N. Kain and Antonio Arrieta. Their work appears in journals such as Hospital Pediatrics, Scientific Reports, Journal of Surgical Research, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Intelligence-Based Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact