William F. Fry

4.1k total citations
87 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

William F. Fry is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Social Psychology and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, William F. Fry has authored 87 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in William F. Fry's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (15 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers). William F. Fry is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (17 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (15 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers). William F. Fry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Uzbekistan. William F. Fry's co-authors include M. S. Swami, J. Schneps, U. Camerini, Michael Miller, Barbara Napier, John E. Lewis, William C. Eby, Richard W. Hubbard, Jerry W. Lee and Lee Berk and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, JAMA and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

William F. Fry

85 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William F. Fry United States	24	694	583	221	198	180	87	1.9k
Paul H. Barrett United States	20	103 0.1×	286 0.5×	45 0.2×	247 1.2×	147 0.8×	63	1.9k
Patrick O’Donnell Canada	33	231 0.3×	1.4k 2.5×	105 0.5×	460 2.3×	132 0.7×	205	3.6k
Alain Girard France	27	391 0.6×	442 0.8×	653 3.0×	232 1.2×	327 1.8×	242	2.7k
Larry D. Miller United States	19	328 0.5×	387 0.7×	342 1.5×	28 0.1×	221 1.2×	50	1.3k
Martin Deutsch United States	23	92 0.1×	653 1.1×	153 0.7×	180 0.9×	560 3.1×	100	2.4k
Robert Henley Woody United States	15	198 0.3×	198 0.3×	300 1.4×	34 0.2×	130 0.7×	103	802
Peter Krämer Germany	29	171 0.2×	154 0.3×	273 1.2×	205 1.0×	559 3.1×	208	3.9k
John Dollard United States	19	273 0.4×	192 0.3×	404 1.8×	169 0.9×	1.4k 7.9×	50	3.1k
Glenn H. Miller United States	19	195 0.3×	293 0.5×	252 1.1×	48 0.2×	355 2.0×	102	1.6k
E. M. Bernstein United States	21	405 0.6×	598 1.0×	2.1k 9.4×	426 2.2×	797 4.4×	95	4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by William F. Fry

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Fry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Fry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Fry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Fry

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Fry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Fry. The network helps show where William F. Fry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Fry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Fry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Fry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Fry. William F. Fry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fry, William F., et al.. (1993). Advances in humor and psychotherapy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 15 indexed citations

Fry, William F.. (1992). The physiologic effects of humor, mirth, and laughter. JAMA. 267(13). 1857–1858. 116 indexed citations

Slane, Patrick & William F. Fry. (1989). Anomalous periodicity in the very high energy gamma-ray sources. The Astrophysical Journal. 342. 1129–1129. 7 indexed citations

Azimov, S.A., S. L. Lutpullaev, Khusniddin K. Olimov, et al.. (1981). Multiplicity of secondary particles in inelastic proton-neon interactions at 300 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 23(11). 2512–2521. 12 indexed citations

Fanourakis, G., L.K. Resvanis, G. Grammatikakis, et al.. (1980). Study of low-energy antineutrino interactions on protons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 21(3). 562–568. 24 indexed citations

Fry, William F.. (1978). Paranoid episodes in manic-depressive psychoses. American Journal of Psychiatry. 135(8). 974–976. 5 indexed citations

Fry, William F., et al.. (1975). Calculation of the neutron-induced background in the Gargamelle neutral current search. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 4 indexed citations

Baldo-Ceolin, M., F. Bobisut, E. Calimani, et al.. (1975). Experimental study of the K0 → π+π−π0 decay. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 25(4). 688–708. 1 indexed citations

Camerini, U., et al.. (1966). Measurement of the K{sup 0}{sub S} - K{sup 0}{sub L} mass difference by the time dependence of strangeness. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

10.

Cline, D. & William F. Fry. (1964). Experimental Study of the Decay ModeK+→π++π0+γ. Physical Review Letters. 13(3). 101–103. 23 indexed citations

11.

Ely, Robert P., Wilson M. Powell, Howard S. White, et al.. (1962). Experimental Test of the Selection RuleΔS=ΔQ. Physical Review Letters. 8(3). 132–136. 55 indexed citations

12.

Baldo‐Ceolin, M., et al.. (1957). THE DECAY OF A $Sigma$$sup +$ HYPERON-PROTON FRAGMENT. Il Nuovo Cimento. 13 indexed citations

13.

Fry, William F., J. Schneps, & M. S. Swami. (1956). Disintegration of Hyperfragments. II. Physical Review. 101(5). 1526–1535. 41 indexed citations

14.

Fry, William F., J. Schneps, & M. S. Swami. (1955). K-Mesonic Decay of a Slow Secondary Particle. Physical Review. 97(4). 1189–1190. 22 indexed citations

15.

Fry, William F., et al.. (1954). Non-mesonic decay of a bound V 1 0 -particle. Il Nuovo Cimento. 11(5). 547–554. 2 indexed citations

16.

Fry, William F. & M. S. Swami. (1954). Energetic Disintegration of a Heavy Nuclear Fragment. Physical Review. 96(3). 809–810. 14 indexed citations

17.

Fry, William F., et al.. (1953). Range Distribution ofμ-Mesons fromπ-Meson Decay in Photographic Emulsion. Physical Review. 90(2). 207–210. 22 indexed citations

18.

Fry, William F.. (1952). Phenomena Associated with Negativeμ-Mesons Stopped in Photographic Emulsions. Physical Review. 85(4). 676–677. 12 indexed citations

19.

Fry, William F.. (1951). Evidence for the Decay of a Negativeπ-Meson in a Photographic Emulsion. Physical Review. 84(2). 385–386. 4 indexed citations

20.

Fry, William F.. (1951). Ratio of Negative to Positiveπ-Mesons in the Stratosphere. Physical Review. 82(5). 747–747. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact