William E. Russey
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry
- Pharmacology
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Biochemistry
- Co-authors
- Paul R. Ortiz de MontellanoHans‐Dieter DanielE. J. CoreyKurt D. KaufmanH. EbelMatthias W. HaenelErick M. CarreiraChristian Bittner
- Topics
- Synthesis of Organic Compounds (2 papers)Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers)Synthesis and Biological Activity (1 paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Organic ChemistryTetrahedron Letters
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William E. Russey
10 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Molecular Biology 160
- Organic Chemistry 58
- Pharmacology 43
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 42
- Biochemistry 41
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Russey
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Russey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Russey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Russey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Russey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Russey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Russey. The network helps show where William E. Russey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Russey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Russey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Russey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Russey. William E. Russey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | How to write a successful science thesis | 1 |
| 2 | Organic Synthesis Workbook | 1 |
| 3 | Text and Graphics in the Electronic Age: Desktop Publishing for Scientists | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review | 78 |
| 6 | The Art of Scientific Writing: From Student Reports to Professional Publications in Chemistry and Related Fields | 12 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 171 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2 |
About William E. Russey
William E. Russey is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Computer Science Applications and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis of Organic Compounds (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Activity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (42 citations), Biochemistry (41 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations). William E. Russey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Ortiz de Montellano, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, E. J. Corey, Kurt D. Kaufman, H. Ebel, Matthias W. Haenel, Erick M. Carreira and Christian Bittner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Tetrahedron Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.